30 September 2015

Notes - mull over

         Mid-afternoon. You worked in the yard earlier, moving dirt, raking and planting grass where some areas had died, probably from the lack of water this last month. You had a late lunch at Cracker Barrel and presently Carol is in Kroger’s on Mason-Montgomery Road. You had two kind short notes from former Indian Hill students from back in the early seventies today. One said she is now fifty-eight and is ready to tackle Shakespeare with the complete works in front of her. (She promised you she would read some Shakespeare after high school.) The other student said hello after reading the comments about Martian water and added he has two published self-help books on Amazon. He also remembered that you let him write a short story in class in loo of another assignment one time during his senior year. – Amorella

         1515 hours. It makes me feel good that people remember their English class. I thanked them both. Warms my heart, it does.

         It is part of your bonus pay, boy, and it’s worth more than gold to you. – Amorella

         1518 hours. I’m just happy they remember my classes with a sense of interest, challenge and hope. I always appreciate their kindnesses.  – Last night, before bed I was thinking about what a metaphysical event is and quickly realized that a mystical experience is not a metaphysical experience on the part of a human being. A metaphysical event cannot not happen in the physical world.

         True, but in here, in the blog and books there can be repercussions from such an event. – Amorella

         Nearing suppertime. You are at Pine Hill Lakes near the dam waiting for Carol to complete her walk. You did do your forty minutes of exercises today and feel better, hoping to get more into the routine now that your left hip is better. Both pieces, the heating pad with vibrator and the five-foot heating pad with vibrator arrived today. You tried the one-foot square, heating pad at noon and it works as advertized. – Amorella

         1727 hours. I am pleased both arrived. I’ll have to try the larger one too – it works on the floor or on the bed or you can cover yourself with it if you are really cold. Carol talked to a lady who is coming out Friday morning to look at our bathrooms and give us some ideas on updates. Tomorrow, Jill comes to clean the house. We have another day with life as good for us. Here comes Carol.

         Carol made an excellent chili for supper and you spiced it up to your liking. You watched “Blindspot” and “NCIS” (both that you enjoyed) as well as NBC News. – Amorella

         2158 hours. Earlier you said there could be repercussions of a metaphysical event in the physical world, at least in the books. How can this be shown? I mean surely I need to create describe to the reader a metaphysical event first.

         Why does the metaphysical event have to come first? – Amorella

         2201 hours. Okay, this ‘m-event’ takes place in ‘stuff’ without time and space. Let’s work backwards. How does the repercussion of the m-event make itself known in the ‘real’ fictional physical world in the book?

         You are not asking the right question. This is something you can mull over in your sleep, boy. Post. - Amorella


** **
        

29 September 2015

Notes - replaceable / shut up / wonder up / metaphysics

         Late morning. Carol has been washing clothes and readying for her luncheon with her retired younger colleagues at Blue Ash Elementary (Sycamore Community Schools) at the Silver Spring House Restaurant on the corner of Kemper and Snyder Roads at twelve thirty. You just finished reading the November issue of Consumer Reports and before that the October issue of National Geographic for a change in the daily pace. – Amorella

         1118 hours. I read them both cover to cover, something of a rarity. The day is gray cast and rainy, a good morning for reading; and both magazines arrived yesterday, so they are fresh news, so to speak. The most interesting N.G. article is “Mystery Man” about the Homo naledi of the Rising Star Cave in South Africa. The best in C.R. is “Lies, Secrets and Scams” on how senior citizens are taken by hucksters of all sorts. Some seniors lose their life savings by fraud. Both magazines (their varied articles) mirror major aspects of our modern cultures.

         1134 hours. I wonder what my character Yermey would find interesting and think upon by reading both magazines today? What if there was nothing left of Homo sapiens on the Earth but these two newly dated magazines? What could be inferred from their pages about our species and our cultural ways by just the contents of the October issue of National Geographic and the November issue of Consumer Reports?

         Carol is leaving for her younger-oriented retirees. Her luncheon on Thursday, the Blue Ash Retired Teacher’s (BART), meet. These are mostly older retired teachers that the younger one’s never taught along side of. Carol began her teaching when the original Blue Ash School was at the corner of Kenwood and Cooper Roads. It was replaced some decades ago with a shopping mall. – Amorella

         1204 hours. We are all replaceable, Amorella.

         In physical parts alone, yes, that is the case, boy. Post. - Amorella



         1319 hours. I did something rather foolish by posting a comment on shamanism on a FB page I cannot remember. I didn’t agree with what the writer and had written. I don’t even remember what I wrote, but it is not my place to say what is and what it is not, particularly uninvited, and even worse, when I do not know what the truth is about shamanism. – rho

         You asked me internally if you should leave your comment on the page. I did not respond. Who knows why you did? Now you can’t find the page though it is one recommended by the Facebook page, Conscious Standpoint, whose video you recently shared from your Facebook artist friend, Robert Frank. – Amorella

         1329 hours. I like the abstract pictures/painting I discovered on ‘Conscious Standpoint’. I use words to depict the esoteric, others, like C.S and Robert Frank use visuals. Visuals are refreshing to me.

         Post. – Amorella
        
         1332 hours. I need to just shut up. 



         Mid-afternoon. You are over at the Mason Community Center waiting for Carol to walk her mile at the indoor track as it is still raining, and rain is what the community needs this month. – Amorella

         1521 hours. I watched most of the recent “Vicious” while eating fat free cottage cheese for lunch before Carol arrived home; she worked on the mail; I went upstairs. Jadah followed and we had an unscheduled forty-five minute nap. I probably needed it as much as she did.

         You are a bit under the weather today, literally as well as figuratively. The news has died down about discovering flowing Martian saltwater and aliens are no longer a topic in mind. – Amorella

         1541 hours. I don’t think of you as an alien, Amorella.

         From my perspective no one or thing is alien anywhere. – Amorella

         1542 hours. I suppose that is right. If you feel as though you are an – if forget the word. Not a good day for conversation, Amorella.

         You and Carol are home with plans to go to Panera for supper later.

** **
From Your Quora Digest

Why is Schrodinger's cat alive and dead instead of alive or dead?

Viktor Toth, IT pro, part-time physicist

8.8k Views • Viktor has 12 endorsements in Physics.

Schrödinger's cat is not alive and/or dead. This is a decades-old mischaracterization of a whimsical thought experiment.

Before I explain, let me bring up another thought experiment: an apparatus (e.g., a two-slit experiment) in which a particle, say an electron, can take two different paths to get to its destination (e.g., a screen). The interference pattern that we observe on the screen tells us that individual electrons did not follow definite paths; rather, they took both paths simultaneously, which an electron can do so long as it is not "caught in the act", i.e., not observed. And just looking at the point of impact of an individual electron does not allow us to reconstruct a specific path either... the electron was really in two (or more) places at once. The electron has no well-defined position until it interacts with its environment (that is to say, a macroscopic apparatus) that measures its position.

In the famous kitty-cat thought experiment, something similar to the electron, a quantum system that can exist in a superposition of two states, is used to trigger a mechanism to kill a cat. The cat, the fable goes, exists in both states at once until the box is opened, at which point it collapses into a well-defined (alive or dead) state.

Nonsense. When I open the box and I find a live cat, I have zero doubt in my mind that the cat was alive all along. Similarly, when I open the box and the cat is dead, I can solicit the help of a qualified veterinarian and ascertain the exact time the cat died (or better yet, just put a camera set to record into the box along with the cat.) Unlike the two-slit particle experiment, in which case no definite path can be reconstructed even after the particle impacts the screen and is measured, for the cat, its history can be reconstructed unambiguously. The wavefunction of the particle triggering the mechanism decohered when it interacted with a large, complex system with many degrees of freedom (namely, the cat); it did not have to wait for the box to be opened.

Yes, quantum mechanics can be counterintuitive and sometimes difficult to reconcile with everyday experience. But not this difficult. The "cat is alive and dead" thing is just nonsense that stands in the way of understanding; it does not improve understanding. (Of course Schrödinger was no fool either; he offered this thought experiment as a means to ridicule certain ideas, now somewhat outdated in the light of quantum field theory, about the interpretation of quantum mechanics.)

Selected and edited from - quoraDOTcom

** **

         You wonder on the article, as it were. What else can be done? Post. - Amorella


         Some errands and a stop at Chipotle/Panera for supper, then a stop at Carter’s and Hallmark before heading home. Carol mentioned she didn’t feel up to sorts today also and blames it on your flu shots yesterday afternoon. You agree. – Amorella

         After a couple more errands and supper you arrived home to watch NBC News a half hour late and then last night’s new “NCIS-LA”. – Amorella

         2043 hours. I feel much better knowing that my ‘off day’ is probably caused by the senior flu shot. I don’t have a reaction every year but sometimes. I asked Carol earlier about staying at the condo a second week if the weather’s good. She thinks it’s a good idea. I’ll have to see what Chris and Larry (the owners of the condo) say.

         Time for bed, early tonight for a change. Post. – Amorella

         2138 hours. I wonder what would be the Metaphysical Equivalent of a Physical Quantum Entangling Event?

       You could save some time by first defining a metaphysical event. Something to sleep on, boy.   - Amorella

       2208 hours. I have come up with two definitions of 'metaphysics' but not yet a contextual 'event'.

       Add and post. - Amorella


** **
metaphysics

Definition of metaphysics in English:

plural noun

[USUALLY TREATED AS SINGULAR]
1
The branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things, including abstract concepts such as being, knowing, substance, cause, identity, time, and space.

Metaphysics has two main strands: that which holds that what exists lies beyond experience (as argued by Plato), and that which holds that objects of experience constitute the only reality (as argued by Kant, the logical positivists, and Hume). Metaphysics has also concerned itself with a discussion of whether what exists is made of one substance or many, and whether what exists is inevitable or driven by chance

Origin
Mid 16th century: representing medieval Latin metaphysica (neuter plural), based on Greek ta meta ta phusika 'the things after the Physics', referring to the sequence of Aristotle's works: the title came to denote the branch of study treated in the books, later interpreted as meaning 'the science of things transcending what is physical or natural'.

Definition of metaphysics in:

Selected and edited from oxforddictionariesDOTcom

** **
A second definition of metaphysics from emporiaDOTedu:

** **

1. Metaphysics, a definition.

A beginning definition of metaphysics involves the word itself. Meta-physics is Greek for "after-nature." Thus metaphysics is concerned with the question of what exists beyond nature, or does something invisible support the visible world? For example, we do see part of the world before us. Is this all there is to it? Is there more that we cannot see? If so, how can we know about it?

Metaphysics is far more complicated than asking the question of what exists beyond nature. It is interested in the nature of nature, space, time, number of basic elements in the world, motion, change, causality, and other issues.2

One of the early definitions of metaphysics was that of Aristotle, who wrote:

There is a science, which investigates being qua being and what belongs essentially to it. This science is not the same as any of the so-called "special sciences"; for none of these sciences examine universally being qua being, but, cutting off some part of it, each of them investigates the attributes of that part, as in the case of the mathematical sciences.3

Aristotle proceeds to talk about being as distinct from various disciplines. Similarly, metaphysics has been called "the science of sciences"4 because it is not merely interested in the accumulation of facts only, but in systematic reflection on these facts uncovered by various scientific disciplines. The inadequacy of traditional discipline lines is indicated by the crossing of the lines such as biochemistry, biophysics, astro-physics, and others.

Metaphysics has overtones of another discipline, religion. Religion is also interested in what it means to be, and whether there is reality beyond the natural world. However, religion suffers severe criticism from a number of modern metaphysicians. A.E. Taylor, who is quite sympathetic to religion in many ways, claims that metaphysics deals with ultimate questions "in a purely scientific spirit; its object is intellectual satisfaction, and its method is not one to appeal to immediate intuition or unanalyzed feeling, but of the critical and systematic analysis of our conceptions."5 Taylor's view relegates all religious thinkers to the level of romantics or irrationalists. Heidegger similarly rules out an appeal to the God of the Bible, because "a believer cannot question without ceasing to be a believer."6

In both Taylor and Heidegger there is the feeling or presumption that believers are not thinkers. But what about the atheist who begins his thought with only nature and after examining the alternatives concludes that the God of the Bible makes more sense in his attempt to understand the metaphysical issues? Neither Taylor nor Heidegger are true to the spirit of metaphysics. They rule out beforehand a possible answer that might be of great help.

One of the traditional criticisms against metaphysics is that it demands too many presuppositions to begin. The ideal is always to begin without presuppositions. Can metaphysics be systematic and conclusive if it omits an area of investigation for help? Metaphysics is not religion, but if metaphysics is to seek an understanding of the totality of nature, it would seem that it should not deliberately ignore religion. If metaphysics is to be the science of the sciences, or the science of being, then nothing should be ruled out and everything will be examined with equal fervor.”

Selected from - CHAPTER VI Metaphysics: Definitions and Issues
Part I - http://www.emporiaDOTedu/socsci/research-and-teaching-links/philosophy-book/chp6.html

** **





28 September 2015

Notes - water / mind / vocabulary? /

         Mid-Monday morning. You are sitting in the shade of a tree facing east at the upper earth dam lot at Pine Hill Lakes. Carol is on her mostly daily walk. You had a strange dream this morning, and one you don’t wish to acknowledge because only two main characters one in it, Jean N. your high school classmate and Bill M. It appeared to be Bill M. dream though you were Bill M.’s point of view.

         0956 hours. I don’t wish to discuss the dream because it was not my dream. I don’t even know what I was doing there. In one slice of the dream Jean was asking Bill if he wanted a cookie cut up so he could eat it with a fork. I thought, ‘why would I want to eat it with a fork; just hand me the cookie, thank you.’ The setting was at a lonely resort along what appeared to be Lake Erie or at the edge of a wide river, one as wide as Lake Erie is. The lodge was mostly empty, sometimes it looked like we were in a school hallway but there were no lockers. Maybe it was an abandoned military facility. Nothing spooky – just lonely. Bill (myself) was in a wheel chair running it backwards down the hallway using his feet to push it like it was a fun toy. The waters would rise and fall. The somewhat decrepit boats were not running (maybe that’s decrypted boats). How did I just write this without remembering the dream? Weird. Amorella, this is just plain weird. It’s nonsense.

         Sometimes dreams are that way, boy. Nonsense. – Amorella

         1008 hours. I don’t have memorable dreams too often. Rarely is the setting so bleak except for Bill having fun with the wheelchair. That was just before I woke up in the bedroom chair, which was disorienting for a moment because I thought I was in bed. I had gotten up with Carol about seven-thirty but Jadah wanted warmed up so I sat in the chair with her before going downstairs and I didn’t wake up until eight-thirty. It was one of those mornings I guess.

         Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, boy. – Amorella

         1014 hours. At least it wasn’t a Freudian dream, nothing worth overanalyzing.

         Later dude. – Amorella

         1107 hours. Seems like there may be water on Mars. We’ll know shortly via NASA.  Pumped.  

         Post. - Amorella


** **

Science and Environment - BBC

Martian salt streaks 'painted by liquid water'
By Jonathan Amos
BBC Science Correspondent

1 hour ago
 - From the section 
Science & Environment

Scientists think they can now tie dark streaks seen on the surface of Mars to periodic flows of liquid water.

Data from a Nasa satellite shows the features, which appear on slopes, to be associated with salt deposits.

Crucially, such salts could alter the freezing and vaporisation points of water in Mars's sparse air, keeping it in a fluid state long enough to move.

Lujendra Ojha and colleagues report the findings in the journal Nature Geoscience.

There are implications for the existence of life on the planet today, because any liquid water raises the possibility that microbes could also be present. And for future astronauts on Mars, the identification of water supplies near the surface would make it easier for them to "live off the land".

Researchers have long wondered whether liquid water might occasionally flow across the surface today.

Secret source

It is not a simple proposition, because the temperatures are usually well below zero Celsius and the atmospheric pressure is so low that any liquid H2O will rapidly boil.

But the observation over the past 15 years of gullies and surface streaks that appear to change with the seasons has heightened the speculation.

Dr Ojha has now presented new data from the US space agency's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter that seems to solve the conundrum.
MRO has an instrument called Crism that can determine the chemistry of surface materials.

It has looked at four locations where dark streaks are seen to come and go during Martian summer months.

Crism finds these "recurring slope lineae" (RSL) to be covered with salts.

They are salts - magnesium perchlorate, chlorate and chloride - that can drop the freezing point of water by 80 degrees and its vaporisation rate by a factor of 10.

The combination allows briney water to stay stable long enough to trickle down hillsides and crater walls.

Quite where the water is coming from to make the streaks is still unclear, however. The locations studied by MRO are equatorial, and any stored water in this region of Mars, perhaps in the form of ice, is thought to exist only at great depth.

One possibility is that the salts actually pull the water out of the atmosphere. The Curiosity rover has found some strong pointers to this mechanism. But again, it is not known whether there is a sufficient supply in the air to facilitate a decent flow.

Another theory is that local aquifers are breaking up to the surface, but this does not really fit with streaks that appear from the tops of peaks.

It is conceivable that streaks are being formed from different sources in different parts of Mars.

Contamination question

Dr Joe Michalski is a Mars researcher at the Natural History Museum in London. He called the announcement an exciting development, especially because of its implications for the potential of microbes existing on the planet today.

"We know from the study of extremophiles on Earth that life can not only survive, but thrive in conditions that are hyper-arid, very saline or otherwise 'extreme' in comparison to what is habitable to a human. In fact, on Earth, wherever we find water, we find life. That is why the discovery of water on Mars over the last 20 years is so exciting."

An interesting consequence of the findings is that space agencies will now have some extra thinking to do about where they send future landers and rovers.

Current internationally-agreed rules state that missions should be wary of going to places on Mars where there is likely to be liquid water.

A UK space agency expert on Mars landing sites, Dr Peter Grindrod, told BBC News: "Planetary protection states that we can't go anywhere there is liquid water because we can't sterilise our spacecraft well enough to guarantee we won't contaminate these locations. So if an RSL is found within the landing zone of a probe, then you can't land there. That would be kind of ironic for Europe's forthcoming ExoMars rover because it's designed to look for life."

Selected and edited from – BBCDOTCOM

** **

            Post, boy. – Amorella

           1215 hours. This is very cool stuff, Amorella.


** **



            Post, boy. – Amorella

         1215 hours. This is very cool stuff, Amorella. And, I found another cool BBC article on consciousness.

** **
Future – BBC
In Depth / Neuroscience

“Blindsight: the strangest form of consciousness”

Some people who have lost their vision find a “second sight” taking over their eyes – an uncanny, subconscious sense that sheds light into the hidden depths of the human mind.

By David Robson
28 September 2015

When Daniel first walked into London’s National Hospital, ophthalmologist Michael Sanders could have had little idea that he would permanently alter our view of human consciousness.

Daniel turned up saying that he was half blind. Although he had healthy eyes, a brain operation to cure headaches seemed to have destroyed a region that was crucial for vision. The result was that almost everything to the left of his nose was invisible to him. It was as if he were looking out of a window, with the curtains drawn across half of his world.

Daniel was adamant that he could not see a thing, yet somehow his unconscious mind was guiding him correctly

And yet, as Sanders began testing him, he noticed something very strange: Daniel could reach out and grab Sanders’ hand, even when it must have fallen right behind his blind spot. It was as if some kind of “second sight” was guiding his behaviour, beyond his conscious awareness.

Intrigued, Sanders referred Daniel to the psychologists Elizabeth Warrington and Lawrence Weiskrantz, who confirmed the hunch with a series of clever tests. They placed a screen in front of Daniel’s blind spot, for instance, and asked him to point at a circle, when it appeared in different places. Daniel was adamant that he could not see a thing, but Weiskrantz persuaded him to just “take a guess”. Surprisingly, he was almost always right. Or Weiskrantz and Warrington would present a single line on the screen, and Daniel had to decide whether it was horizontal or vertical. Again, Daniel was adamant that nothing had appeared before his eyes, yet his accuracy was around 80%, much more than if he had been guessing randomly.

Clearly, despite his blindness, Daniel’s healthy eyes were still watching the world and passing the information to his unconscious, which was guiding his behaviour. Publishing a report in 1974, Weiskrantz coined the term “blindsight” to describe this fractured conscious state. “Some were sceptical, of course, but it has held its own and become an accepted phenomenon,” Weiskrantz says today. And over the following decades, the condition has come to answer some fundamental questions about the human mind.

Just how many of our decisions occur out of our awareness, even when we have the illusion of control? And if the conscious mind is not needed to direct our actions, then what is its purpose? Why did we evolve this vivid internal life, if we are almost “zombies” acting without awareness?

“These cases open a window into parts of the brain that are normally not visible,” says Marco Tamietto, who is based at Tilburg University. “They offer a view to functions that are difficult to observe – that are normally silent.”

Unravelling the mind

Consciousness is so deeply intertwined with everything we do, that many scientists had previously believed it would be impossible to study. How can you pick apart the rich fabric of our minds to find the one thread that gives rise to the vivid sense of awareness, of feeling and “being” and experiencing the world, without unravelling everything else around it?

Daniel, whose name has been changed for this article and is known in the literature simply as DB, offered some of the first clues. “What you want to do is to look at something that is as close to consciousness as possible, but which is lacking that specific quality, that subjective experience,” says Christopher Allen at Cardiff University. “And that’s what blindsight gives you. The participant is still perceiving, but they lack awareness of perception.”

Despite their blindness, these people can somehow sense emotions in a face – and they even start to unconsciously mimic the expressions

One of the first tasks was to test exactly what blindsight patients are capable of without their conscious visual awareness – and the results have been quite remarkable. Of particular interest has been the fact that they can sense emotion: when presented with faces, they can tell whether it is happy or sad, angry or surprised, and they even start to unconsciously mimic the expressions. “Even though they did not report anything at a conscious level, we could show a change in attitude, a synchronisation of emotional expressions to the pictures in their blind field,” says Tamietto, who has worked extensively with Weiskrantz.

Besides mirroring expressions, they also show physiological signs of stress when they see a picture of a frightened face. “The plan for the future is to try to train them to pay attention to bodily reactions,” says Tamietto. It might be helpful to notice if they are in danger, for instance. “They can use the bodily changes to understand what’s going on in the world – as an indication that there is something interesting or problematic.”

In 2008, Tamietto and Weiskrantz’s team put another blindsight patient through the most gruelling test yet. Unlike Daniel, he was blind across the whole of his visual field, and normally walked with a white cane. But the team took away his cane and then loaded a corridor with furniture that might potentially trip him up, before asking him make his way to the other side. “Despite saying he wasn’t able to see, we saw him shooting by on his very first attempt,” says Tamietto. You can watch it for yourself, on the video below.

Importantly, the participant claimed that not only was he not aware of having seen anything; he was not even aware of having moved out of the way of the objects. He insisted he had just walked straight down the hallway. According to Beatrice de Gelder, who led the work, he was “at a loss to explain or even describe his actions”.

It was like seeing a black shadow moving against a completely black background

Only in very rare circumstances do they come close to being aware of what they are seeing. For instance, one subject was able to distinguish movement in fast, high-contrast films; he described it as being like “a black shadow moving against a completely black background” – a “sense of knowing” that there was something beyond. But even then, he could not describe the content itself, meaning that his experience lacked almost everything we would normally associate with vision. “There’s a lot of controversy about whether those reports truly reflect visual experiences,” says Kentridge.

Reversible blindness

Of all the questions these studies have posed, the most pressing has been why? What causes the conscious and unconscious to decouple so spectacularly? Tellingly, all the blindsight subjects had suffered damage to a region known as V1, at the back of the head, suggesting that it is this region that normally projects the stream of images into our awareness.

To test their ideas, scientists can use a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that disrupts different brain regions, in an attempt to induce a reversible form of blindsight in healthy participants. Keen to know how it feels, I recently took part in one of those experiments at Allen’s lab in Cardiff, UK. (You can see a video of the procedure below.)

The technique is called “transcranial magnetic stimulation”, which uses a strong magnetic field to scramble the neural activity underneath the skull. “The advantage is that you don’t have to cut someone’s head open to demonstrate the same behavioural characteristics as clinical blindsight,” Allen told me before the experiment.

Eventually I noticed a fleeting dark line cross my vision, a bit like an old TV monitor just after you pressed the off switch

The experiment began with Allen placing a magnet over the back of my skull, just above V1. Next, he began applying the magnetic field for short intervals at increasing strengths. At first, all I could feel was a slight tapping sensation (the effect of the magnetic field on my skin) but eventually I did notice a fleeting dark line crossing the centre of my vision, a bit like an old TV monitor just after you pressed the off switch. It only lasted less than a second, however, and although it gave me a small shock, I soon became used to the sensation.

After Allen had found the right power, I sat in front of a computer screen, and he flashed up pictures of arrows for a split second: my job was to say whether they pointed left or right. The pictures were sometimes timed with the TMS signals causing the temporary blindness – and like Daniel in those original experiments, I often saw nothing and felt that I was guessing. Nevertheless, once I had finished, Allen told me that I had answered many more correctly than would be expected by chance alone, suggesting the TMS had succeeded in giving me blindsight.

Through studies such as this, Allen has found tentative evidence that the visual information is funnelled through the “lateral geniculate nucleus”, deep in the centre of the brain – a bypass around V1 that allows the information to be processed unconsciously in areas involved in emotion or movement.

Eventually, the researchers may even understand how the brain creates visual consciousness itself – and why V1 is so crucial. One idea is that consciousness relies on communication to and from many areas of the brain – and maybe V1 is working as a hub that helps orchestrate that broadcast.

Picking apart the experience may also reveal further clues about the power of unconscious mind. To understand how, imagine that you are part of a strange puppet show. You have been blindfolded, and your limbs are tied to invisible strings. Every so often, they are tugged here or there by a hidden puppet master, leading you through a complicated dance. To the audience, it looks like you are in full control of your actions, but you don’t have the foggiest idea of what you’ve just done.

The non-conscious mind acts as the puppet master, pulling the strings without their knowledge

That puppet show is essentially what happens when someone with blindsight navigates their way past obstacles – with the non-conscious mind acting as the puppet master. “It shows that awareness isn’t the whole story,” says Tamietto. “Very often we believe we have decided something, but our brain has made the decision for us before that – in many ways, and in many contexts.”

Juha Silvanto at the University of Westminster  agrees:

“Consciousness is just a summary of all the information coming in, but the fact the subconscious can guide behaviour suggests that elaborate processing is going on without us being aware of it.” Indeed, some philosophers have gone as far as to wonder whether we could be little more than “zombies” acting on mostly unconscious impulses.

Some philosophers have gone as far as to claim that we could be little more than “zombies” acting on mostly unconscious impulses

This, in turn, begins to cast doubt on some long-held assumptions about the very nature, and purpose, of consciousness. After all, it is by no means certain that other animals have a rich inner life like us, so it must have emerged for some reason. Previously, psychologists had proposed that we have a kind of “spotlight of attention” that sweeps over our vision, and when it lands on an object, the object pops into consciousness. In this way, our heightened awareness helps highlight the most important parts of a scene, giving us the chance to respond.

Except Robert Kentridge at the University of Durham has evidence to suggest this too may be wrong. His insight came when he was talking to a blindsight subject in between some of the basic visual tests, in which he flashed different images at different parts of the blind spot. The subject had said that he thought he would do better if we were told where, in the blind spot, the image would appear. “It seemed very strange,” says Kentridge – since they have no awareness of what is in their blind spots, they shouldn’t be able to focus their attention there. “It’s as if you were trying to direct attention around the back of head – you shouldn’t be able to do it,” he says.

Even so, he was happy to play along and design a separate experiment where he could give the subject a clue about where the image might appear. The results were a kind of paradox: even though the participant was still not able to actually see anything, his subconscious discrimination seemed to be quicker. In other words, the subject really was “paying attention” – but without being conscious of exactly what he was attending.

For this reason, Kentridge thinks we need to rethink our ideas about consciousness and attention. Rather than it acting as a spotlight to boost perception, he instead suspects that consciousness may have evolved to boost memory, drawing together all the different pieces of information into a cohesive picture that is easier to remember. “You need to encode what’s happening in the world in a single package,” he says.

These are just the first of many clues that may eventually solve the riddles of human consciousness. Sadly, Daniel will not be taking part in those further experiments. “He passed away last November, but was a willing subject for many years,” Weiskrantz tells me. By gently reaching into his darkness, however, he has shown the way for others to follow, guiding us through some of the biggest mysteries of the human mind.

Selected and edited from -- http://www.bbcDOTcom/future/story/20150925-blindsight-the-strangest-form-of-consciousness

** **
         1232 hours. I seem to have a ‘sense’ of this, an understanding of the article even though I am not blind. My sense of understanding comes from how an intuitive moment feels. It is a similar feeling, or appears to be.

         Post. - Amorella

         1541 hours. We had a late lunch at Piada Street Italian then went to Montgomery Family Medicine at Montgomery Road and Cornell for our annual flu vaccine and feel better for having it done early.
        
         Carol is on page 251, Chapter 36 of David Baldacci’s The Escape. You are at the far north lot of Pine Hill Lakes. You have been forcing yourself not to think about the coincidences of my comments on alien microbes yesterday and the announcement of flowing water on Mars today. And, on how you mentioned ‘grok’ and the reference to ‘water’ and Mars earlier in the post. – Amorella

         1549 hours. It is embarrassingly silly to think on but I had no choice – such seeming coincidences just pop up. I have been thinking more consciously about ‘where’ the blind spot was in their head’. I think back to the lady expert told me my subconsciousness would ‘connect with a favorite color’ (mine is orange) when reading aloud more quickly than I usually can. It worked and I imagine still does. I can read aloud more easily and with fewer errors if I think of the color orange when reading aloud. She demonstrated this in front of my peers (educators) while at an Indian Hill School District meeting. When I have an ‘event’ of similar kind I attempt to consciously and otherwise ‘view’ what part of the brain is enacting this information. I do not need physical eyes to ‘see’ some things. It is not the same as the blindsight for the blind but I understand the correlation. Essentially, I grok it. – rho

         Your word choices show a lack of vocabulary to explain how you ‘see’ intuitive-like events without eyes, but essentially what you are saying has been witnessed by me, the Amorella.

         1606 hours. I am sure that somewhere in all these posts there are examples of me intimating that I am seeing something without using my eyes. If I weren’t so lazy I’d look up a couple as examples.

         1647 hours. I did find one reference to “without eyes” in August but Merlyn is talking, so obviously, it’s in a fiction. I stopped looking before June 2015. Well, what does this show me? It shows me that I mix my personal self with my fictional character(s).

         At least you didn’t apologize for this, boy. – Post. - Amorella