Notes - Articulation / Centeredness

        Mid-morning. Chores, breakfast and paper, chores, and the focus is on motel reservations for the short California trip in April.

         I have been thinking about those iceberg photos. I don’t know if they are real or doctored, and I don’t know what a tiny amount of Presence is either. I don’t know what Presence is, but as you are here in my head, imagination or not; I guess that passes for Presence. I don’t know if the capital is apropos but as we capitalize proper names I can see no harm in it.

         Feel better now?

         These things bug me, Amorella. I know the photos were being useful as they were, but I am bothered by thoughts/concepts I cannot perceive correctly. This is nothing new. I remember talking to the psychiatrist who hypnotized me back in the eighties and telling him that it seemed to me that two realities exist in nearly the same place, perhaps as much as one half an inch a part, almost like it is/was a visual problem such as stigmatism. It is just a constant perception mentally. He smiled and said not to concern myself, and that I wasn’t certifiable, then laughed confidently – this reaction was very positive to me so I mostly ignore it. However, the icebergs bring it up. Something is missing from how we view reality, this is my opinion. I would hope that part of the Merlyn series shows this.

         It does indeed, orndorff, as does the blog. What are you thinking, boy? You have no specific words for it. The closest ones that come to mind are what you declare yourself to be – an existential transcendentalist. Or, is it a transcendental existentialist? Do you see the difference? If it can be either one or the other at any given time of thought, then perhaps this is the specific problem you cannot otherwise articulate. Later, dude. Post. – Amorella.

         Lo and behold, I tried the Lucida Handwriting font again and this time it works. Most awesome.

         A miracle, no doubt.

         I did not think that did I? If I thought it, it was just a figure of speech. I don’t really believe in miracles.

         It doesn’t make any difference what you believe, orndorff. That is what you say. I agree. Why don’t you look up the definition.

         Okay. “2: an extremely outstanding or unusual event, thing, or accomplishment.” According to Merriam-Webster. It doesn’t have to relate to ‘divine intervention’.

         For consistency in your thinking here, what about your angels?

         ‘Angels’ in my personal definition means ‘natural beings of consciousness that exist outside the realms of physics’. I think of G---D as ‘beyond Nature/Physics but all else within a natural order whether we as a species recognize this or not. That is the reason that in the fictional books there is a conscious connection between the Living and the Dead. It is a natural connection in my mind not a supernatural one. Out of ‘supreme’ respect for the possibility of an existence of G---D, I separate this Being from all others in my sense of natural order.

         In other words what some people believe you accept as a possible fact of Nature?

         A probable fact of Nature better fits my thoughts.

         Then ‘probable’ it is as far as this blog and the books go. – Amorella.

        

         This is good today. I need to know where my ‘center’ is. You are quite helpful, Amorella. Thank you.

         You can’t be honest unless you know who you are, boy. Post. – Amorella.