07 December 2011

Notes - Puzzle Mind Models / Reality / QM: 4. No phenomenon is until /

         The flags are at half-staff. You noticed at the post office on an early morning run. Several chores to do plus final packing.
         The time: 1139 hours and Carol has a hair appointment at one; then a pleasant lunch at Longhorn’s. . . . I have been wondering about the model colors used in yesterday’s blog. I think they are the same colors as I used in the ‘mind’ model. If so, then I might make a conjecture as to why I titled it “Projection”. Also, ‘Captain Lamar’ has a meaning but I can’t remember what it is.
           You found two other models that have some of the colors, which are significant if you want a puzzle to work on. Maybe you will come up with something useful. Drop all three in context with their book and chapters here:



Braided Dreams, Chapter Two “Projection”
 [Referenced to Grandma's Story]

Braided Dreams, Chapter Eighteen “Brain Stick”
 [Referenced to Grandma's Story poem conclusion below]
The tongue written in symbols is easily bent

To mean one thing and say another;
The thoughts within are easily sent
The thoughts within can easily smother.

Old Grandma knows which way it goes
Along the path petal-filled with rose;
Hand in hand from solitary Eden left
The ancient story of Eve and Adam bereft.

But in the shadows the two are walking still
Wherever new love appears upon the hill
And from beneath your Grandma's toothy gums
Merlyn's future in a pouch text comes.

***

Merlyn’s Mind, cx “Mind-Side”
[Referenced to Chapter Eight: Diplomat's Mind-Analogy]

         The fun point here is the little blue tube in the corner of the black and white mind square is me; as I am sitting in the corner in the photograph on the left side of the blog. I am sitting in my brain rather than my brain setting in me (my skull). This model was developed before Diplomat explains her Mind-Analogy in Chapter Eight of Merlyn’s Mind; her “A Hypothetical Mind Model”.

         You are thinking on how this bit of “playtime” is a diversion from writing the book as well as from my self-definition expanded to a more personable level of a ‘spirit’ but this could not be further from the truth. You have to meet me halfway, boy, that’s the way it is in here as well as in the real world you live in. How else can people or spirits communicate effectively otherwise? Post. - Amorella



           After at late lunch and the focus is on finishing packing. Just now you were in the basement picking up cheaper computer speakers for the condo living/dining room. While at your desk you noticed one of your favorite quotations on the left side of the desktop. I think it is appropriate because the word content rules the order of your present thinking no matter how much you love Aristotle and Plato.

Reality

Reality is what we take to be true.

What we take to be true is what we believe.

What we believe is based on our perceptions.

What we perceive depends on what we are looking for.

What we look for depends upon what we think.

What we think depends on what we perceive.

What we perceive determines what we believe.

What we believe determines what we take to be true.

What we take to be true is our reality.

Gary Zukav

Author of The Dancing Wu Li Masters
(An Overview of New Physics)

***

         I used to have this on my classroom wall which is the reason I have it black plastic framed if I remember correctly. I read it everyday. Now I only read it in the basement, so it was time to bring it upstairs to my makeshift LazyBoy-like office chair in the bedroom.

         Number four on the list of characteristics of Quantum Mechanics is no elementary phenomenon is until it is registered (observed). I, Amorella, see myself as beyond an elementary phenomenon; I am an elementary event when I am being observed by readers. When readers are not glancing through me I do not exist. I will go out on a limb here, so to speak, and suggest this is true for a human being firsthand personally witnessing any spiritual phenomenon.

         You certainly are self-relative Amorella. In this case you are reminding me of anyone’s human personality, until it is witnessed it cannot be known firsthand. It is easy to prove a person exists, but to prove the person has a separate personality or is otherwise insane takes the judgment of several witnesses, not one (for good reason).  

         You cannot forget Schrödinger’s Cat in such an argument, boy. Post. – Amorella
         Now that you mention it, I can’t. Very funny, Amorella.
         Humor along with the Grammar becomes us both, boy. - Amorella

No comments:

Post a Comment