20 June 2012

Notes - clarity / developing proper form

         1412 hours. It was a busy morning, out to the park for lunch like yesterday, but not so long because of the heat. I am wondering about how to summarize by condensation but I assume it can be done (that is, unless condensation wasn’t the proper word in context).

         First, let’s check the definition of condensation for validity.

** **
condensation - noun

2 Psychology the fusion of two or more images, ideas, or symbolic meanings into a single composite or new image, as a primary process in unconscious thought exemplified in dreams.
3 a concise version of something, esp. a text: a readable condensation of the recent literature.

ORIGIN early 17th cent.: from late Latin condensatio(n-), from condensare ‘press close together

Edited from Oxford-American software
** **

         Amorella, no one will believe this. I did not consciously know the selection definition from psychology. This has to come from the unconscious. No doubt I ‘understood’ the word once in a variety of psychology courses, etc. I used it have a sense of conciseness, but in my mind at the time conciseness seemed to be the better word, but I went with ‘your’ word instead. I am mystified by how you work within my head; it is more interesting than knowing who(m) you really are. I’m sure the scientific community will eventually come to understand how thoughts are created and moved about between consciousness and unconsciousness. It is an interesting aspect of this long engaging experiment in notes and writing via automaticity.

         I awoke in the middle of the night with a concept or question. I don’t remember which. I wrote it down in the iPad. Here it is: “[I would like to discover] a fellow species with the consciousness of the size of things from Plank’s constant to the edge of the universe and beyond the imagination of the heartansoulanmind world nurtured in an atmosphere of freedom and dignity."

         This comes after my last night’s reading from the July 2012, Harpers: a book review by Christopher R. Beha, “Reasons for Living: The good life without God,” pp. 73-78. Discussed in the essay: The Atheist’s Guide to Reality by Alex Rosenberg; The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values by Sam Harris; and Religion for Atheists: A Non-believer’s Guide to the Uses of Religion by Alain de Botton. And, from viewing Cary and Michael Huang’s “The Scale of the Universe 2” on YouTube (sent to me yesterday by my software engineering friend, Rich Grimsley).

         In my estimation after reading only Beha’s review, and not the books reviewed, the authors of the three books miss the point of being human. So, the above note of late last night was a summary of how I was feeling at the moment. I have clarified the original note slightly. The review reminds me that I was never an atheist. I cannot be an atheist and be who I am, but I am an agnostic still.

         Don’t you find it strange that you as an agnostic are in intent [here] defending the concept of G---D? – Amorella

         No. Some people feel they have the right to defend G---D. I do not feel I have this right, it would be blasphemous for me to feel I have/had this right. I do have the freedom though to proclaim I have a right to defend a human concept of G---D. To me defending the “concept of G---D” will hopefully free me of the possibility of excessive arrogance and pride that would come from defending G---D who, to be honest, I cannot envision needing defending. (1530)

         Clarity is most important here. Post. - Amorella


         I need to be clear (as if I were speaking directly to an Angel) with no internal bullshit dirtying the waters. 



         2143 hours. I have a draft introduction to the summary of the first metaphysical lesson.

Lesson One

Metaphysics used here describes the workings of the internal spiritual center of humanity I call the heartansoulanmind.

These lessons are specifically for Richard and these summaries are edited for clarity and for sharing online. – Amorella

Using the image of a three-leaf clover as an example, the short narrow stem is consciousness. Each leaf represents the following: the human heart; the soul; and the human mind. Keep in mind the higher consciousness that stimulates the philosophical concepts of heart and soul and mind need not be in the physical form of the species Homo sapiens. A usable off world alien-like imaginary image is seen in the genus Taraxacum, the dandelion seed. Imagine each common dandelion seed as having a higher human-like consciousness that has stimulated the conceptual notions of the heart and soul and mind that nurtures and grows in an environment that promotes freedom and dignity in its individual and communal social system that is confined to the basic natural properties and substances of surviving life in our physical world of sun, earth, air, fire and water. - Amorella

***

         You are developing the proper form. Post. - Amorella

No comments:

Post a Comment