21 July 2013

Notes - disconcerting / butter on the bread


         By mid-morning you were up and had breakfast and read the Sunday paper, took a pill for arthritic pain and a nap. Awoke and did forty minutes of exercises, played with Jadah who was craving for some personal attention, helped Carol with a computer problem on her Mac, i.e. "restart it and see if the problem will go away." It did. -  Amorella

         1255 hours. That takes us to the present moment, Amorella. I assume we will head out to lunch in the next hour.

         You have returned to your stationary position at Pine Hill Lakes after lunch at Penn Station where Tylersville ends at Western Row. Carol is reading the August Better Homes and Gardens and yesterday you read the first of a new subscription to Popular Science. - Amorella

         I did. It is fun to look at mostly because it reminds me of how much I treasured that magazine in my youth and actually read during almost all those teaching years because it and a dozen other magazines were available from the school library. High school libraries are perks for the teacher. I think I read four or five magazines a week, not every article but at least one or two in almost all of them in a variety of subjects; Scientific American was one of the best. Once in a while there were esoteric articles on quantum mechanics and even Milton's Paradise Lost. I used a few articles on Paradise Lost, on the birth/language development and on quantum mechanics in my lectures. Today I refresh myself on Wikipedia mostly and educational sites.

         You woke up this morning thinking about the Miller Analogy Test, the only test you ever did well on and the test that got you admitted into Bowling Green State University. - Amorella

         That's true. How lucky I was for that test, otherwise they wouldn't have taken me because of my low overall average at Otterbein. If I hadn't taken 68 or 69 semester hours in English literature at Otterbein I never would have graduated. I really like most of my classes but I had learning problems (which I learned to handle myself) and I still have diversified memory problems plus I have trouble with articulation when it comes to speaking and writing. Otherwise, you wouldn't be here.

         That's a stretch but in the short and the long of it there is some truth to what you say; you are right, I wouldn't be here to help. You have, at times, a faulty reality function that allows you to see faulty reality.  - Amorella

         That's an odd way of putting it.

         This is what I am talking about. You use it to your advantage though. Let's say, if there were two 'twilight zones' you would, at times, be in both at once. - Amorella

         Does this mean that if I am in two twilight zones I can see them three dimensionally?

         This is an example of faulty reality. Some thoughts you have learned are best kept to yourself. You are wondering if the Miller Analogy still exists. Look it up. - Amorella

** **
Miller Analogies Test

The Miller Analogies Test (MAT) is a standardized test used primarily for graduate school admissions in the USA. Created and still published by Harcourt Assessment, the MAT consists of 120 questions in 60 minutes (formerly 100 questions in 50 minutes).
Content and use

The test aims to measure an individual's logical and analytical reasoning through the use of partial analogies. A sample test question might be
Bach : Composing :: Monet :
a. painting
b. composing
c. writing
d. orating

This should be read as "Bach is to (:) Composing as (::) Monet is to (:) _______." The answer would be a. painting because just as Bach is most known for composing music, Monet is most known for his painting. The open slot may appear in any of the four positions.
Unlike analogies found on past editions of the GRE and the SAT, the MAT's analogies demand a broad knowledge of Western culture, testing subjects such as science, music, literature, philosophy, mathematics, art, and history. Thus, exemplary success on the MAT requires more than a nuanced and cultivated vocabulary. In-house factor analysis studies, however, show that only one major factor accounts for most of a person's performance.
The MAT has fallen out of favor among some admissions departments, yet it is still widely accepted in the social sciences, education, and occasionally in the humanities. For most graduate programs the GRE is the most common qualifying exam.
Format and scoring

In the fall of 2004, the exam became computerized; test-takers can now opt to take it as a computer-based test (CBT), although the pen-and-paper exam still exists.
Out of the 120 questions, only 100 count in the test taker's score. The remaining 20 questions are experimental. There is no way for test takers to identify any of the 20 experimental questions on a given test form, as the two types of questions are intermingled.
Tests taken before October 2004 were scored simply by the number of questions the test-taker answered correctly with a range from 0-100. Scores using this metric have historically been known as "raw" scores.
Tests taken in October 2004 or later have a score range from 200 to 600. The median score is 400, with a standard deviation of 25 points. These scores, based on a normal curve, are known as "scaled" scores. Because of their grounding in this model, scaled MAT scores of 500-600 are extremely rare, as they would be more than four standard deviations above the norm of 400.
Percentile ranks are also provided along with the official score report. Test takers receive an overall percentile rank as well as a percentile rank within their intended graduate school discipline.
The Miller Analogies Test is accepted by Mensa, the Triple Nine Society and the Prometheus Society for its admission requirements. For tests administered prior to October 2004, a raw score of 66 is required for MENSA qualification. For tests administered during and after October 2004, MENSA requires a score in the 95th percentile for admission. The Triple Nine Society requires at least a raw score of 85 on the "old" MAT, and at least 472 on the modern one. The Prometheus Society requires at least a raw score of 98 on the "old" MAT, and at least 500 on the modern one.

From: Wikipedia Offline

** **
         Carol remembered it is National Ice Cream day and all single dips at Graeters are $1.43 as that is the age of the company.

** **
Graeter's

Graeter's is a regional chain of shops offering ice cream, baked goods, and candy that originated in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1870. Their super premium, thick ice cream has been featured on Food Network, and has earned them many dedicated fans, including Oprah Winfrey.
"French pot" process

Graeter's ice cream is made in a French pot batch process. The ice cream mix is placed into a chilled, spinning French pot. As the cream freezes on the sidewall of the pot, a blade gently scrapes the pot's sidewalls, folding the slowly freezing cream into itself. It takes about 20 minutes to freeze a two-gallon batch. For flavors that include chocolate chips, a low melting temperature liquid chocolate is poured into the pot, and freezes into a thin shell on top of the ice cream. A worker uses a blade to break up this shell and mix it into the ice cream, resulting in Graeter's famous huge dark chewy chocolate chips.
Each batch of ice cream is only about two gallons (7.6 L) and is thus very labor intensive. The resulting ice cream is so thick that it must be hand-packed into pints (473 mL). An article in The New York Times in 1997 explains that for reasons not understood, superior ice creams are made in batches of two gallons or less. In making that point, the article cited the example of Graeter's, which it said "is considered by most connoisseurs to be the finest ice cream in the world."

From Wikipedia Offline

** **
         What does Graeters have to do with blog or books, boy? - Amorella

         I can make it dessert in Brothers 20.

         Sounds like a good idea. You are stopped at Kroger's at Tylersville on the way home from ice cream.

         1606 hours. We are home and Carol is talking to Linda, first time since she arrived home. I think I must have erred, or someone erred in telling me I did well on that test. Perhaps I did better than on the GRE, but that's it. I'm rather embarrassed about this because, well, of my natural mental difficulties, some problem stem from being as premature as I was and surviving the ordeal. Who knows? Anyway, it got me into BGSU and later allowed me to get into a pre-doctorate program at BG, but that was not completed; and I did not get into Miami's doctorate program probably for the obvious reasons. I did enjoy the 16 postgraduate hours in the Ohio Writing Project at Miami in the 1990's and was eventually considered a 'Fellow' in the project; so much for formal training. Shoot, my parents didn't think I would graduate from high school. I did do better than that, but I would not have made it in today's testing program. There is no way I could have done the math. I am tired of talking about myself; it is embarrassing.

         Find a better word than embarrassing. - Amorella

         It is either humiliating or disconcerting.

         Chose one. - Amorella

         It is disconcerting.

         Post. - Amorella


         You suddenly remember someone told you that you got a 62 on the Miller Analogy. - Amorella


         (1627) I have a poor memory. That just popped into mind. It is probably wrong. No doubt it is.

         That is not what you feel. You feel it was 62. - Amorella

         I am wrong, Amorella. No question about it. I am probably thinking about another test. I think Dr. Coulter told me that after I got admitted and I stopped at Otterbein to thank him for his letter of recommendation. That's the way I remember it. He was happy to see I made it in and told me that I'd better do well as he had given me an excellent recommendation. John Coulter was a kind man.

         Add to the post.  - Amorella

         If Dr. Coulter said 62, he probably said it to give me confidence. 


         2051 hours. Doug sent me a couple of forwards today. The one below hints at an idea; I just haven't placed it.

** **

Virus Genome Finding Points To New Branch In Tree Of Life   "nature" |  By Ed Yong

Posted: 07/20/2013 10:27 am EDT  | Updated: 07/20/2013 10:44 am EDT [Huff Post Science]

The organism was initially called NLF, for “new life form”. Jean-Michel Claverie and Chantal Abergel, evolutionary biologists at Aix-Marseille University in France, found it in a water sample collected off the coast of Chile, where it seemed to be infecting and killing amoebae. Under a microscope, it appeared as a large, dark spot, about the size of a small bacterial cell.
Later, after the researchers discovered a similar organism in a pond in Australia, they realized that both are viruses — the largest yet found. Each is around 1 micrometre long and 0.5 micrometres across, and their respective genomes top out at 1.9 million and 2.5 million bases — making the viruses larger than many bacteria and even some eukaryotic cells.
But these viruses, described today in Science, are more than mere record-breakers — they also hint at unknown parts of the tree of life. Just 7% of their genes match those in existing databases.
“What the hell is going on with the other genes?” asks Claverie. “This opens a Pandora’s box. What kinds of discoveries are going to come from studying the contents?” The researchers call these giants Pandoraviruses.
“This is a major discovery that substantially expands the complexity of the giant viruses and confirms that viral diversity is still largely underexplored,” says Christelle Desnues, a virologist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research in Marseilles, who was not involved in the study.
Claverie and Abergel have helped to discover other giant viruses — including the first, called Mimivirus, in 2003, and Megavirus chilensis, until now the largest virus known, in 2011. Pandoravirus salinus came from the same Chilean water sample as M. chilensis. Claverie picked up the second Pandoravirus, P. dulcis, from a pond near Melbourne, where he was attending a conference.
The viruses’ presence on separate continents helped to establish that they were not artefacts of known cells. It also suggests that the Pandoraviruses are widespread, Claverie says.

Indeed, other scientists had previously mistaken them for parasitic or symbiotic bacteria. Rolf Michel, a parasitologist from the Central Institute of the Bundeswehr Medical Service in Koblenz, Germany, found one in 2008, in an amoeba living in the contact lens of a woman with keratitis. “Reading this stunning article, I recognized that both P. salinus and P. dulcis are almost identical to what we described a few years ago,” he says. “We had no idea that those giant organisms could be viruses at all!”
The researchers showed that Pandoraviruses lack many of the hallmarks of cellular organisms such as bacteria. They do not make their own proteins, produce energy via ATP or reproduce by dividing.
They do, however, contain some of the core genes that are common to giant viruses, and they have a viral life cycle. Under an electron microscope, the researchers saw the viruses being taken up by amoeba hosts, emptying their proteins and DNA into the host cells, commandeering the host-cell nuclei, producing hundreds of new viral particles and, finally, splitting the host cells open.
The researchers are now trying to determine the viruses’ origins by characterizing the unknown genes and the proteins they encode. They have long suspected that giant viruses evolved from cells; if they are right, the ancestors of Pandoraviruses must have been very different from the bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes we have today. “We think that at some point, the dynasty on Earth was much bigger than those three domains,” says Abergel. Some cells gave rise to modern life, and others survived by parasitizing them and evolving into viruses.
The discovery suggests that scientists’ may revise their concept of what a virus looks like. “After reading the article, many people may wonder if they have something on their shelves that might be a giant virus,” says Abergel. “We still have more crazy things in store that we expect to be able to publish next year.”
This story originally appeared in Nature News.

From Huff Post Science
 [My bold and underline.]
** **

            I am not sure self-replication works better than evolution. If probes were built to evolve wouldn't they become more selective and efficient?


** **
Alien Space Probes? Physics Paper Considers Craft Other Beings May Have Built To Explore Our Galaxy

The Huffington Post  |  By Macrina Cooper-White
Posted: 07/21/2013 10:27 am EDT

Ever wonder if aliens have been spying on us? You're not alone. In a provocative new paper, a pair of astrophysicists consider the possibility that intelligent alien beings could have built a fleet of self-replicating space probes that use gravity to sling themselves from star to star.
"We're saying that if aliens build self-replicating probes, they could explore the entire Milky Way in about ten million years," study co-author Dr. Duncan Forgan, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Edinburgh’s Institute for Astronomy, told The Huffington Post in an email.
Ten million years is a relatively short time span, given that scientists estimate the universe is around 13.8 billion years old.
How could such probes make copies of themselves? Dr. Duncan said that we humans seem to be closing in on the necessary technology ourselves, and "with current 3D printing tech, it might only be a century or two before humans figure it out!"
Travel by slingshot effect -- also called gravity assist -- isn't as wacky as it sounds either. When a probe passes near a planet, it can get a boost in speed from the planet's gravity. NASA has exploited the phenomenon on many occasions--perhaps most notably with the Voyager I and II space probes. Launched in 1977, the probes used gravity assist to reach the edge of our solar system.
Alien probes using the same slingshot maneuvers wouldn't have to depend on powerful engines or massive amounts of fuel. And they could explore the galaxy 100 times faster than probes navigated by powered flight, Dr. Duncan said.
The paper, entitled "Slingshot Dynamics for Self-Replicating Probes and the Effect on Exploration Timescales," was published in the International Journal of Astrobiology.

From Huffington Post
[My underline]
** **

         You and Carol spent some time watching last week's "Motivation" and finishing some chores. Dusk and you are considering probes into the hearts and souls and minds of Connie, Cyndi, Robert and Richard. Shared memories certainly play a role in all three. All it takes is a word or two to drill into a known common fact or fantasy. Each of the four knows this. In real life it is the butter on the bread. Post. - Amorella

         2110 hours. These four characters know who they are. They will play it out on their own terms.


No comments:

Post a Comment