31 December 2014

Notes - comfort / metaphor only / no images / something useful / being

         You awoke refreshed, had a light breakfast of toast, peanut butter, raisins, a banana and a glass of skim milk. Carol is reading the paper and watching morning TV downstairs. It looks to be a sunny morning as the sun is up but not quite touching the bedroom window. Earlier you had an epiphany of sorts when you realized the coincidence of Adult Make-Believe when you place the ‘I’ in front: ‘IAMB’ and remember a great trauma in your life at age three or four. Your comfort blanket, that you carried with you everywhere finally dissolved into tatters in a final wash. It was a blue and white soft blanket about two by three feet originally and you called it “B”. It’s modern equivalent is your MacAir. “B” was not an imaginary comfort but it allowed your imagination to grow into it and it became ‘sacred’ to you, a more-than-it-was. The epiphany is that you feel the simplest explanation for myself, Amorella, is that “I” am “A”: an adult make believe reality. Is this not correct? – Amorella

         0829 hours. You said it better than I could have expressed it. I like simple explanations and I have no problem with this one because it makes sense both from ‘my’ inner child’s point of view as well as ‘my’ reasonable and responsible adult point of view. This takes nothing away from what you allow me to do – to focus my imagination on invisible matters that count. If this allows me to create a story of souls being the children of Angels, so be it. One day, all that will be left is the story and the rest is a self-declared written experiment (blog and novels) showing my imagination and reason at work through a transparent glass on the Internet. I can live with this. – rho

         Good. Comfort of heartansoulanmind is an important matter no matter what one’s age, that’s how I, the Amorella, see it. Post.




         Late morning. You have been napping while Carol dried her hair. Eventually you will head to Outback for lunch (Carol’s idea), which of course, you are fine with. You are intrigued at the difference of the eye in blue and have forgotten the original meaning of the icon. - Amorella

** **
In 1782, the Eye of Providence was adopted as part of the symbolism on the reverse side of the Great Seal of the United States. It was first suggested as an element of the Great Seal by the first of three design committees in 1776 and is thought to be the suggestion of the artistic consultant, Pierre Eugene du Simitiere.

In his original proposal to the committee, Du Similtere placed the Eye over shields symbolizing each of the original thirteen states of the Union. On the version of the seal that was eventually approved, the Eye is positioned above an unfinished pyramid of thirteen steps (again symbolizing the original States, but incorporating the nation's potential for future growth). The symbolism is explained by the motto that appears above the Eye: Annuit Coeptis, meaning "He [God] approves (or has approved) [our] undertakings".

Selected and edited from Wikipedia
** **

         1154 hours. I had forgotten the symbolic meaning on the dollar bill. I find it rather arrogant to have added “Annuit Coeptis” because who is to say “God approves”? Who is to say that she or he speaks for God? What human being can know such things without doubts?

         Boy, this icon in blue is a metaphor for use in telling a story nothing more. Use it. – Amorella

         1202 hours. I tend to over think and complicate matters. Right now I need to ready myself for lunch.

         Post. - Amorella


         You had a relaxing bath and thought a bit about how do over think and realize this is in your nature and thus you don’t know how to do anything about it but continue to learn to live with it. While looking at the article titled, “Eye of Providence” you noted several images given at the bottom of the article, one in particular caught your eye, the ‘Eye of Providence, Jewish cemetery in Kamienna Gora’. What strikes you, as a metaphor is that it is in stone rather than on paper and that it is set in respect to the Dead that you consider a rather fine idea. As such you would feel better deep within to use it as the metaphor in your mind for myself for this story of the children of Angels rather than that found on the U.S. one dollar bill which also entangles with the Free Mason symbol as far as American history goes, at least in your mind. Strange this would bother you who like complications and puzzles of one sort or another when you are a free-minded citizen of a town named Mason. I thought this was the kind of humor you enjoy, boy? – Amorella

         1303 hours. I have few to no words here because I don’t like to dwell on such matters – though I do admit there is humor in it. My focus on the moment is that I feel more comfortable with the ‘eye’ being on stone even metaphorically it has more meaning to me.

         Add the image. You see why I allow no images in the books, boy. I work with letters individually and collectively. No images in the text of the books. That’s my rule. Add and post. Enjoy your lunch. – Amorella

** **

Jewish Cemetery Stone Enhanced (wikipedia)
** **


         You had an excellent dinner, ran an errand and returned home. You enhanced the photo from the Jewish cemetery and dropped it in as your desktop photo for the time. This visual experience heightens your imagination. – Amorella

         1647 hours. I feel I can almost touch this stone piece, that I am that close, eye-wise about a foot in distance. This is two dimensional yet my eyes see evidence that it is not so flat as it appears. I turn my head to the side of this thinnest piece of two dimensional glass and the side expands sideways, the seemingly rough edges are now as wide as it is flat-wise. From the top it appears as a + sign and also as such from the bottom, yet when you look closely it is flat, straight on as is, a singular eye in granite centered in a triangle surrounded by lines depicting the glory of light seemingly from behind the eyeball with accompanied human or marsupial humanoid appearing eyelid. Two the side of this two dimensional object appear an illusion when you are not looking directly at it. (1658)

         So, you have a start in terms of tone and setting. – Amorella

         1659 hours. The only thing hampering me here is the thought of the people caught in panes of crystal in the Christopher Reeves Superman film. Obviously this scene in my head is not made out of crystal.

         Look for a description of an atom from a three dimensional perspective. – Amorella

         1716 hours. I have an actual photograph of a hydrogen atom and the article from Physics World.

** **
Quantum microscope' peers into the hydrogen atom

May 23, 2013


What lies within the H atom?

The first direct observation of the orbital structure of an excited hydrogen atom has been made by an international team of researchers. The observation was made using a newly developed "quantum microscope", which uses photoionization microscopy to visualize the structure directly. The team's demonstration proves that "photoionization microscopy", which was first proposed more than 30 years ago, can be experimentally realized and can serve as a tool to explore the subtleties of quantum mechanics.

Information flow

The wavefunction is a central tenet of quantum theory – put simply, it contains the maximum knowledge that is available about the state of a quantum system. More specifically, the wavefunction is the solution to the Schrödinger equation. The square of the wavefunction describes the probability of where exactly a particle might be located at a given time. Although it features prominently in quantum theory, directly measuring or observing the wavefunction is no easy task, as any direct observation destroys the wavefunction before it can be fully observed.

In the past, "Rydberg wavepacket" experiments have tried to observe the wavefunction using ultrafast laser pulses. In these experiments, the atoms are in a superposition of their highly excited "Rydberg states". These experiments show that the periodic electron orbitals around nuclei are described by coherent superpositions of quantum-mechanical stationary states. The wavefunction of each of these states is a standing wave with a nodal pattern (a "node" is where there is zero probability of finding an electron) that reflects the quantum numbers of the state. While previous experiments have attempted to capture the elusive wavefunction or the nodal patterns, the methods used were not successful. Direct observation of the nodal structure of a single atom being most difficult to achieve.

Plotting waves

In the new work, Aneta Stodolna, of the FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics in the Netherlands, along with Marc Vrakking at the Max-Born-Institute in Berlin, Germany, and other colleagues in Europe and the US have shown that photoionization microscopy can directly obtain the nodal structure of the electronic orbital of a hydrogen atom placed in a static electric field. In the experiment, the hydrogen atom is placed in the electric field E and is excited by laser pulses. The ionized electron escapes from the atom and follows a particular trajectory to the detector – a dual microchannel plate (MCP) detector – that is perpendicular to the field itself. Given that there are many such trajectories that reach the same point on the detector, interference patterns can be observed, which the team magnify by a factor of more than 20,000 using an electrostatic zoom lens. The interference pattern directly reflects the nodal structure of the wavefunction. The experiments were carried out with both resonant ionization involving a Rydberg state and non-resonant ionization.
The team chose the hydrogen atom thanks to its unique properties. "These [hydrogen atoms] are very peculiar...as hydrogen has only one electron, which interacts with the nucleus via a purely Coulombic interaction, it has a particular structure when we place it in a DC electric field," says Vrakking. He goes on to explain that thanks to its single-electron status, hydrogen's wavefunction can be written as the product of two wavefunctions, which describe how it changes as a function of two coordinates – the so-called parabolic coordinates. That is, the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom (in an external electric field) describes a splitting of its energy levels, which is known as the "Stark effect". More importantly, though, this "Stark Hamiltonian" is exactly separable in terms of the two parabolic coordinates, which are linear combinations of the distance of the electron from the hydrogen nucleus r and the displacement of the electron along the electric-field axis z.

Vrakking told physicsworld.com that the shape of the two parabolic wavefunctions is therefore "completely independent of the strength of the field, and so it is invariable – it stays the same as the electron travels for more than half a metre in the experiment – all the way from where the ionization occurs up to the 2D detector". This, he explains, is crucial to scaling up the spatial distribution to magnify the nodal patterns to millimetre-scale dimensions, where they can be observed with the naked eye on the 2D detector and recorded with a camera system. "What you see on the detector is what exists in the atom," he says. The group observed several hundreds of thousands of ionization events to obtain the results, with the same preparation of the wavefunction for each.

What lies within

The figure at the top of this article shows the team's main result – the raw camera data for four measurements, where the hydrogen atoms were excited to states with zero, one, two and three nodes in the wavefunction for one of the parabolic coordinates. "If you look at the measured projections on the detector, you can easily recognize the nodes, and see their radial, ring-like structure," says Vrakking.

He also points out the "striking difference" between images recorded following resonant excitation and images recorded following non-resonant excitation – this is seen in the image to the right, where a comparison is given between a measurement taken for one resonant and two non-resonant nodes. Images (A) and (C) were taken after non-resonant ionization, while for the central image, (B), the laser was tuned to a resonance with two nodes in the wavefunction. For the resonant ionization, the outermost ring extends significantly further radially, compared with the other two images – something that could be explained by a special kind of tunnelling effect taking place.

Vrakking says that the ultimate goal of the research was to study and visualize the hydrogen atom. Future experiments may look at how the atom would react within a magnetic field, study time-resolved electron dynamics, investigate holographic interference microscopy and perhaps even observe molecules using photoionization microscopy.

Helium under the microscope

Currently, however, the researchers are studying and analysing a helium atom using photoionization microscopy, and a paper on this will be published in the coming months. "As there are two electrons in a helium atom, we are getting some very interesting information," says Vrakking. He says that while in some aspects the responses of the helium atom are very similar to that of hydrogen, there are also some major differences. "Although one of the helium electrons is very tightly bound to the nucleus, and the other one is very highly excited, we can see that the electrons know of each other's existence and that they 'talk to each other'," says Vrakking, explaining that this could allow the team to "see" entanglement of the electrons.

The research is published in Physical Review Letters.

Selected and edited from - http://physicsworldDOTcom/cws/article/news/2013/may/23/quantum-microscope-peers-into-the-hydrogen-atom

** **
         1723 hours. Articles and photos such as this blow my mind and imagination.


         Good. Let it rest in your head. Something useful here will make itself known. Later. Post. - Amorella

         Almost time for bed, boy. You and Carol had a good evening, she finished her book and you found the four pack of the Indiana Jones films in Blu Ray at Target at the VOA Centre this evening. You both watched the frame by frame completely reworked original film until digital and blu ray, tonight. It looks and sounds like a film made today. You had cereal and popcorn while watching. - Amorella

         2258 Hours. I find myself mesmerized by the enhanced photograph of the ‘eye’ at the Jewish cemetery. It is a work of art and almost three-dimensional to observe, quite surreal, almost phantasmagorical or even chimerical. Now there are a couple of words I don’t use very often.

         Define both. – Amorella

** **
phantasmagorical – adjective

phantasmagorical landscapes: dreamlike, psychedelic, kaleidoscopic, surreal, unreal, hallucinatory, fantastic, fantastical, chimerical.

Selected from Oxford-American software

**
chimerical – adjective

1
:  existing only as the product of unchecked imagination :  fantastically visionary or improbable

2
:  given to fantastic schemes

Selected from Merriam-Webster online

** **
         Phantasmagorical precedes chimerical and your specific meaning of chimerical is ‘fantastically visionary’. This is because the photograph is enhanced and close up and fills the desktop screen, so your mind gets lost in the minute details while you are thinking of the image as a whole piece of art. It thus secretly appears to you as a sacred and mystical illusion in your mind. Do you agree? – Amorella

         2322 hours. How do you construct your observation? I read it as if it is as true as your words, yet the words are not from me because I am too close to my inner self to work such a construction. This is a very odd observation in itself, but yes, I agree this is exactly as I ‘see/read’ the object in my mind. In every sense of the word this observation separates ‘you, the Amorella’ from me, Richard. Yet, I remain of sound mind and more important to me, free to my own thoughts as you are free to yours. (2327)

         Post. Welcome to the New Year, boy, 2015 by your calendar. – Amorella

         2328 hours. What is your calendar, Amorella?

         Being. 

30 December 2014

Notes - Oh / sprite or faery / arrogant / eye

         Mid-morning. You feel better after having had a hot bath earlier, particularly your arthritic conditions. One plus for the morning is that, though cool, southwest Ohio has clear, thus sunny skies. – Amorella

         0943 hours. I need to go over the Wiki soul material and cut it down for Merlyn, just the basics.

         That would be Plato and Aristotle but, like I said I’ll help you with that. Just go to the post and I’ll underline what’s important and we’ll move it here. - Amorella

** **
Soul -  condensed Wikipedia

Socrates and Plato

Drawing on the words of his teacher Socrates, Plato considered the psyche to be the essence of a person, being that which decides how we behave. He considered this essence to be an incorporeal, eternal occupant of our being. Socrates says that even after death, the soul exists and is able to think.

Plato also compares the three parts of the soul or psyche to a societal caste system. According to Plato's theory, the three-part soul is essentially the same thing as a state's class system because, to function well, each part must contribute so that the whole functions well.

Aristotle

Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC) defined the soul or psyche (ψυχή) as the “first actuality” of a naturally organized body,

Avicenna and Ibn al-Nafis

Avicenna (Ibn Sina) and Ibn al-Nafis, a Persian philosopher, They both made a distinction between the soul and the spirit, and the Avicennian doctrine on the nature of the soul was influential among the Scholastics. Some of Avicenna's views on the soul include the idea that the immortality of the soul is a consequence of its nature, and not a purpose for it to fulfill.

He thus concludes that the idea of the self is not logically dependent on any physical thing, and that the soul should not be seen in relative terms, but as a primary given, a substance.

Ibn al-Nafis defined the soul as nothing other than "what a human indicates by saying "I".

Thomas Aquinas

Concerning the human soul, his epistemological theory required that, since the knower becomes what he knows, the soul is definitely not corporeal—if it is corporeal when it knows what some corporeal thing is, that thing would come to be within it. Therefore, the soul has an operation, which does not rely on a bodily organ, and therefore the soul could subsist without a body. Furthermore, since the rational soul of human beings is a subsistent form and not something made of matter and form, it cannot be destroyed in any natural process.

Immanuel Kant

It is from the "I", or soul, that Kant proposes transcendental rationalization, but cautions that such rationalization can only determine the limits of knowledge if it is to remain practical.

James Hillman

Thomas Moore associates spirit with "afterlife, cosmic issues, idealistic values and hopes, and universal truths", while placing soul "in the thick of things: This happens, Moore says, because to transcend the "lowly conditions of the soul ... is to lose touch with the soul, and a split-off spirituality, with no influence from the soul, readily falls into extremes of literalism and destructive fanaticism".

Hillman's archetypal psychology is an attempt to tend to the oft-neglected soul, which Hillman views as the "self-sustaining and imagining substrate" upon which consciousness rests.

Hillman described the soul as that "which makes meaning possible, [deepens] events into experiences, is communicated in love, and has a religious concern", as well as "a special relation with death".

Archetypal psychology acknowledges this third position by attuning to, and often accepting, the archetypes, dreams, myths, and even psychopathologies through which, in Hillman's view, soul expresses itself.

** **
         1140 hours. I completed another 40 minutes of exercises, and I am ready to move with this soul business of narrowing down Merlyn’s definition of a virgin soul, as it were, going into this.

         Already you err, boy. Virgin soul, give me a brake. – Amorella

         1143 hours. You mean like stop?

         Souls are virgin? Look it up, my man. – Amorella

** **
virginnoun

a person, typically a woman, who has never had sexual intercourse.

• a naive, innocent, or inexperienced person, esp. in a particular context: a political virgin.

adjective

1 being, relating to, or appropriate for a virgin: his virgin bride.

2 not yet touched, used, or exploited

Selected and edited from the Oxford-American software
** **

         1149 hours. In my defense I was using the word in reference “to being inexperienced with life” and “untouched, used or exploited”.

         How do you know these things? – Amorella

         1152 hours. I assume the soul is without life, at least life as defined as being on earth (in this universe) alive and thus being untouched by human or marsupial humanoid beings.

         In here souls are the children of Angels. – Amorella

         I have never heard of such a thing. How can Angels have children, and why should they? Why don’t they grow up as Angels?

         It’s a metaphor, orndorff. – Amorella

         1200 hours. Oh.

         Post. - Amorella


         1225 hours. What about the Nephilim?

         You looked it up on Wikipedia. The ‘Children of Angels’ in this blog relating to your Merlyn books of fiction are as offshoots of angelic-like beings before physics. In here a Child of Angels is closer to the light-hearted use of the word ‘sprite’ or ‘faery’. – Amorella

         1233 hours. I understand this may be as Merlyn would say. Interesting. I like the merit of the concept.

         Who would have thought? Post. - Amorella


         Mid-afternoon. You are at Staples for stick-um-notes then to Graeter’s across the street and back up to Kroger’s on Mason-Montgomery Road, all fairly close to one another. A short while ago while talking to Kim on the phone she mentioned Tiffney McF. posted a picture of you and Achilles (former student) talking in front of your famous Mason podium back in the 1990’s. You were delightfully surprised and found it has a few hits from students of that era. - Amorella

Achilles and Me, Mason High 1990’s

         You are at Kroger’s – your lucky day, Carol asked for a dollop of hot fudge for her peppermint stick and you decided on one for your mint chocolate chip and the young lady rang you up for $5.90. You asked, and she noted that the dollops were on the house. Needless to say, Carol was pleased, as were you since you kept the change. – Amorella

         1624 hours. Full disclosure, huh, Amorella?

         You are thinking about the faery as a Child of an Angel and like the concept even more. – Amorella

         1626 hours. I am. There is a lightness about it. In my younger youth I was always partial to the faeries I would see drawn in children’s books. I think of ‘innocence’ yet in the stories there was a lot of mischief surrounding them, particularly the older Celtic stories. You used the term ‘offshoot’ of an Angel. I think of a flower or bush or even tall grass.

         Now you are cooking with gas, boy. Good. Remember me saying I am a .......

         1632 hours. I forget what you say you are? I want to say, “Outlander” but that is not correct. I cannot remember – a Betweener. (1634) How can I forget these nouns?

         That’s the main reason you write everything down, boy. In case you think of something and forget it a few seconds later. – Amorella

         1638 hours. I could have looked it up. I thought about doing that but what reference would I have used? I had nothing but outlander. Such is the state of my mental life – always in a wonder of who I am (figuratively) and what is on or was on my mind (figuratively) seconds ago. I am trying to think of your characteristics as a Betweener.

         It makes no difference here; the point is that I am using aspects of ‘myself’ for this Angelic/Faery/Soul world for Merlyn. – Amorella

         1645 hours. This makes the concept much more perceivable to me. It makes it easier to manifest itself in my imagination and giving reason a more flowery (friendly environmental) face.

         Even a faery story can send a sense of truth to an adult human’s mind, boy.

         1652 hours. Tolkien and the Hobbits.

         Milton and is a bit too heavy here. – Amorella

         1721 hours. We are home. That’s kind, Amorella, even for a pretend Angel to lighten up the story a bit.

         Where’s your dark humor, boy? Amorella

         1727. Ho, ho, ho! That builds a fire under the kettle. Great humor.

         No deed goes unnoticed, boy. If so, where would your words come from? – Amorella

         You are suddenly thinking of Angels as giant black gnats. – Amorella

         1733 hours. I don’t know where that came from but I’m hoping it will go away because I am embarrassed at the thought. This is how it was once. I thought you were a real Angel and such a thought would pop up and I’d be terrified of myself because I could hide no such thoughts from a real Angel and the thoughts just kept coming – worse and worse thoughts – who knew I had such thoughts so far down, so deep as to where an Angel might dwell. No place to hide. Finally I forgave myself, that part of my humanity, and let it go. I just let it all go, that and the whole world.

         Yes. You did do this. I would not be here if you had not. – Amorella

         1739 hours. Even as imagination I see you angelic-like in your kind forgiving nature. It’s okay. I put my private fears away. I just want to write a good story for my grandchildren. A friendly story about how it is to have danced with an Angel in my own adult once-upon-a-time Make-Believe.

         Now, this is the honesty I want out there. You are an open glass, orndorff, and have nothing to fear from Angels, real or imaginary in here. Post. – Amorella

         1744 hours. This appears as self-praise..

         Then you are arrogant. Post. - Amorella


         Evening. You watched NBC News and an old “This Old House Hour”. Otherwise, Carol had on the House and Garden Channel. You had a piece of toast with peanut butter and some delicious peach jam on top for supper. Carol has gone upstairs to finish her new Grisham book Kim got her for Xmas. You have read into the two thirty some pages of “A Short History” and are enjoying it for what it is – a reminder of how things sometimes work on this planet when you are a scientist. – Amorella

         2128 hours. I am a pretend scientist in fiction. I want to know more about these Angels work in the universe of my Merlyn. Are they like you Amorella? I remember you are as a Caretaker for three or four universes. I really have no idea how to view this, but I like this initial concept.

         First, we need not go further than the souls. Angels as I use the term are not imaginary; I have no imagination, remember. – Amorella

         2138 hours. On this enlightening reminder I think it best then to focus on the soul. I imagine them (in context) as blooming, flowering, with a petal like shell rather than hard shelled like an acorn, walnut or hickory nut, a mist, something on the order of an atom – round and fuzzy at the edges but not egg-like; at least this perhaps may be how it would appear to me were I to view it, but my human limitations would allow me to view from a human valued nearly abstract environment – as you say, a metaphor. Perhaps, as such, I would view an Angel in such a setting as a window pane of clear glass, that is, an Angel would have four cornered points, any of which one could be stuck with.

         This is a consideration, but you will need to go a step further in you metaphoric environmental system. Describe how I would look to you as a Betweener in such a like vision. – Amorella

         2153 hours. This is good. A very good idea – I begin with you first then branch to these other spiritual consciousnesses.

         Spiritual Consciousness works. – Amorella
** **
penteract - Noun

(mathematics) A five-dimensional hypercube
Hypercubenoun

Any of a set of objects resulting from the generalization of a two-dimensional square and a three-dimensional cube to n dimensions. A hypercube has 2n corners, each of which is connected to its n nearest adjacent corners by edges that all have the same length.

       A network whose nodes have the connectivity of such an object.

Selected from – wiktionary.yourdictionaryDOTcom
** **

         An all-seeing eye-like construction, something unique in shape: a penteract graph or image (see below)
** **


Penteract Graph


From Wikipedia Commons
** **
** **


Penteract Image via Google

** **

                Let it set in your head for the night. See me in the morning. Post. - Amorella    


              2308 hours. I made this too complicated an eye of one dimension is enough. The very first image that came to mind is the eye on the dollar bill but I thought it was too simple, but simple may be the kindest point of all, at least from my perspective. Otherwise, I could not hope to translate and understand.




         Like your original book covers, blue and white rather than green and white. Good night, orndorff. Post. - Amorella