31 December 2014

Notes - comfort / metaphor only / no images / something useful / being

         You awoke refreshed, had a light breakfast of toast, peanut butter, raisins, a banana and a glass of skim milk. Carol is reading the paper and watching morning TV downstairs. It looks to be a sunny morning as the sun is up but not quite touching the bedroom window. Earlier you had an epiphany of sorts when you realized the coincidence of Adult Make-Believe when you place the ‘I’ in front: ‘IAMB’ and remember a great trauma in your life at age three or four. Your comfort blanket, that you carried with you everywhere finally dissolved into tatters in a final wash. It was a blue and white soft blanket about two by three feet originally and you called it “B”. It’s modern equivalent is your MacAir. “B” was not an imaginary comfort but it allowed your imagination to grow into it and it became ‘sacred’ to you, a more-than-it-was. The epiphany is that you feel the simplest explanation for myself, Amorella, is that “I” am “A”: an adult make believe reality. Is this not correct? – Amorella

         0829 hours. You said it better than I could have expressed it. I like simple explanations and I have no problem with this one because it makes sense both from ‘my’ inner child’s point of view as well as ‘my’ reasonable and responsible adult point of view. This takes nothing away from what you allow me to do – to focus my imagination on invisible matters that count. If this allows me to create a story of souls being the children of Angels, so be it. One day, all that will be left is the story and the rest is a self-declared written experiment (blog and novels) showing my imagination and reason at work through a transparent glass on the Internet. I can live with this. – rho

         Good. Comfort of heartansoulanmind is an important matter no matter what one’s age, that’s how I, the Amorella, see it. Post.




         Late morning. You have been napping while Carol dried her hair. Eventually you will head to Outback for lunch (Carol’s idea), which of course, you are fine with. You are intrigued at the difference of the eye in blue and have forgotten the original meaning of the icon. - Amorella

** **
In 1782, the Eye of Providence was adopted as part of the symbolism on the reverse side of the Great Seal of the United States. It was first suggested as an element of the Great Seal by the first of three design committees in 1776 and is thought to be the suggestion of the artistic consultant, Pierre Eugene du Simitiere.

In his original proposal to the committee, Du Similtere placed the Eye over shields symbolizing each of the original thirteen states of the Union. On the version of the seal that was eventually approved, the Eye is positioned above an unfinished pyramid of thirteen steps (again symbolizing the original States, but incorporating the nation's potential for future growth). The symbolism is explained by the motto that appears above the Eye: Annuit Coeptis, meaning "He [God] approves (or has approved) [our] undertakings".

Selected and edited from Wikipedia
** **

         1154 hours. I had forgotten the symbolic meaning on the dollar bill. I find it rather arrogant to have added “Annuit Coeptis” because who is to say “God approves”? Who is to say that she or he speaks for God? What human being can know such things without doubts?

         Boy, this icon in blue is a metaphor for use in telling a story nothing more. Use it. – Amorella

         1202 hours. I tend to over think and complicate matters. Right now I need to ready myself for lunch.

         Post. - Amorella


         You had a relaxing bath and thought a bit about how do over think and realize this is in your nature and thus you don’t know how to do anything about it but continue to learn to live with it. While looking at the article titled, “Eye of Providence” you noted several images given at the bottom of the article, one in particular caught your eye, the ‘Eye of Providence, Jewish cemetery in Kamienna Gora’. What strikes you, as a metaphor is that it is in stone rather than on paper and that it is set in respect to the Dead that you consider a rather fine idea. As such you would feel better deep within to use it as the metaphor in your mind for myself for this story of the children of Angels rather than that found on the U.S. one dollar bill which also entangles with the Free Mason symbol as far as American history goes, at least in your mind. Strange this would bother you who like complications and puzzles of one sort or another when you are a free-minded citizen of a town named Mason. I thought this was the kind of humor you enjoy, boy? – Amorella

         1303 hours. I have few to no words here because I don’t like to dwell on such matters – though I do admit there is humor in it. My focus on the moment is that I feel more comfortable with the ‘eye’ being on stone even metaphorically it has more meaning to me.

         Add the image. You see why I allow no images in the books, boy. I work with letters individually and collectively. No images in the text of the books. That’s my rule. Add and post. Enjoy your lunch. – Amorella

** **

Jewish Cemetery Stone Enhanced (wikipedia)
** **


         You had an excellent dinner, ran an errand and returned home. You enhanced the photo from the Jewish cemetery and dropped it in as your desktop photo for the time. This visual experience heightens your imagination. – Amorella

         1647 hours. I feel I can almost touch this stone piece, that I am that close, eye-wise about a foot in distance. This is two dimensional yet my eyes see evidence that it is not so flat as it appears. I turn my head to the side of this thinnest piece of two dimensional glass and the side expands sideways, the seemingly rough edges are now as wide as it is flat-wise. From the top it appears as a + sign and also as such from the bottom, yet when you look closely it is flat, straight on as is, a singular eye in granite centered in a triangle surrounded by lines depicting the glory of light seemingly from behind the eyeball with accompanied human or marsupial humanoid appearing eyelid. Two the side of this two dimensional object appear an illusion when you are not looking directly at it. (1658)

         So, you have a start in terms of tone and setting. – Amorella

         1659 hours. The only thing hampering me here is the thought of the people caught in panes of crystal in the Christopher Reeves Superman film. Obviously this scene in my head is not made out of crystal.

         Look for a description of an atom from a three dimensional perspective. – Amorella

         1716 hours. I have an actual photograph of a hydrogen atom and the article from Physics World.

** **
Quantum microscope' peers into the hydrogen atom

May 23, 2013


What lies within the H atom?

The first direct observation of the orbital structure of an excited hydrogen atom has been made by an international team of researchers. The observation was made using a newly developed "quantum microscope", which uses photoionization microscopy to visualize the structure directly. The team's demonstration proves that "photoionization microscopy", which was first proposed more than 30 years ago, can be experimentally realized and can serve as a tool to explore the subtleties of quantum mechanics.

Information flow

The wavefunction is a central tenet of quantum theory – put simply, it contains the maximum knowledge that is available about the state of a quantum system. More specifically, the wavefunction is the solution to the Schrödinger equation. The square of the wavefunction describes the probability of where exactly a particle might be located at a given time. Although it features prominently in quantum theory, directly measuring or observing the wavefunction is no easy task, as any direct observation destroys the wavefunction before it can be fully observed.

In the past, "Rydberg wavepacket" experiments have tried to observe the wavefunction using ultrafast laser pulses. In these experiments, the atoms are in a superposition of their highly excited "Rydberg states". These experiments show that the periodic electron orbitals around nuclei are described by coherent superpositions of quantum-mechanical stationary states. The wavefunction of each of these states is a standing wave with a nodal pattern (a "node" is where there is zero probability of finding an electron) that reflects the quantum numbers of the state. While previous experiments have attempted to capture the elusive wavefunction or the nodal patterns, the methods used were not successful. Direct observation of the nodal structure of a single atom being most difficult to achieve.

Plotting waves

In the new work, Aneta Stodolna, of the FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics in the Netherlands, along with Marc Vrakking at the Max-Born-Institute in Berlin, Germany, and other colleagues in Europe and the US have shown that photoionization microscopy can directly obtain the nodal structure of the electronic orbital of a hydrogen atom placed in a static electric field. In the experiment, the hydrogen atom is placed in the electric field E and is excited by laser pulses. The ionized electron escapes from the atom and follows a particular trajectory to the detector – a dual microchannel plate (MCP) detector – that is perpendicular to the field itself. Given that there are many such trajectories that reach the same point on the detector, interference patterns can be observed, which the team magnify by a factor of more than 20,000 using an electrostatic zoom lens. The interference pattern directly reflects the nodal structure of the wavefunction. The experiments were carried out with both resonant ionization involving a Rydberg state and non-resonant ionization.
The team chose the hydrogen atom thanks to its unique properties. "These [hydrogen atoms] are very peculiar...as hydrogen has only one electron, which interacts with the nucleus via a purely Coulombic interaction, it has a particular structure when we place it in a DC electric field," says Vrakking. He goes on to explain that thanks to its single-electron status, hydrogen's wavefunction can be written as the product of two wavefunctions, which describe how it changes as a function of two coordinates – the so-called parabolic coordinates. That is, the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom (in an external electric field) describes a splitting of its energy levels, which is known as the "Stark effect". More importantly, though, this "Stark Hamiltonian" is exactly separable in terms of the two parabolic coordinates, which are linear combinations of the distance of the electron from the hydrogen nucleus r and the displacement of the electron along the electric-field axis z.

Vrakking told physicsworld.com that the shape of the two parabolic wavefunctions is therefore "completely independent of the strength of the field, and so it is invariable – it stays the same as the electron travels for more than half a metre in the experiment – all the way from where the ionization occurs up to the 2D detector". This, he explains, is crucial to scaling up the spatial distribution to magnify the nodal patterns to millimetre-scale dimensions, where they can be observed with the naked eye on the 2D detector and recorded with a camera system. "What you see on the detector is what exists in the atom," he says. The group observed several hundreds of thousands of ionization events to obtain the results, with the same preparation of the wavefunction for each.

What lies within

The figure at the top of this article shows the team's main result – the raw camera data for four measurements, where the hydrogen atoms were excited to states with zero, one, two and three nodes in the wavefunction for one of the parabolic coordinates. "If you look at the measured projections on the detector, you can easily recognize the nodes, and see their radial, ring-like structure," says Vrakking.

He also points out the "striking difference" between images recorded following resonant excitation and images recorded following non-resonant excitation – this is seen in the image to the right, where a comparison is given between a measurement taken for one resonant and two non-resonant nodes. Images (A) and (C) were taken after non-resonant ionization, while for the central image, (B), the laser was tuned to a resonance with two nodes in the wavefunction. For the resonant ionization, the outermost ring extends significantly further radially, compared with the other two images – something that could be explained by a special kind of tunnelling effect taking place.

Vrakking says that the ultimate goal of the research was to study and visualize the hydrogen atom. Future experiments may look at how the atom would react within a magnetic field, study time-resolved electron dynamics, investigate holographic interference microscopy and perhaps even observe molecules using photoionization microscopy.

Helium under the microscope

Currently, however, the researchers are studying and analysing a helium atom using photoionization microscopy, and a paper on this will be published in the coming months. "As there are two electrons in a helium atom, we are getting some very interesting information," says Vrakking. He says that while in some aspects the responses of the helium atom are very similar to that of hydrogen, there are also some major differences. "Although one of the helium electrons is very tightly bound to the nucleus, and the other one is very highly excited, we can see that the electrons know of each other's existence and that they 'talk to each other'," says Vrakking, explaining that this could allow the team to "see" entanglement of the electrons.

The research is published in Physical Review Letters.

Selected and edited from - http://physicsworldDOTcom/cws/article/news/2013/may/23/quantum-microscope-peers-into-the-hydrogen-atom

** **
         1723 hours. Articles and photos such as this blow my mind and imagination.


         Good. Let it rest in your head. Something useful here will make itself known. Later. Post. - Amorella

         Almost time for bed, boy. You and Carol had a good evening, she finished her book and you found the four pack of the Indiana Jones films in Blu Ray at Target at the VOA Centre this evening. You both watched the frame by frame completely reworked original film until digital and blu ray, tonight. It looks and sounds like a film made today. You had cereal and popcorn while watching. - Amorella

         2258 Hours. I find myself mesmerized by the enhanced photograph of the ‘eye’ at the Jewish cemetery. It is a work of art and almost three-dimensional to observe, quite surreal, almost phantasmagorical or even chimerical. Now there are a couple of words I don’t use very often.

         Define both. – Amorella

** **
phantasmagorical – adjective

phantasmagorical landscapes: dreamlike, psychedelic, kaleidoscopic, surreal, unreal, hallucinatory, fantastic, fantastical, chimerical.

Selected from Oxford-American software

**
chimerical – adjective

1
:  existing only as the product of unchecked imagination :  fantastically visionary or improbable

2
:  given to fantastic schemes

Selected from Merriam-Webster online

** **
         Phantasmagorical precedes chimerical and your specific meaning of chimerical is ‘fantastically visionary’. This is because the photograph is enhanced and close up and fills the desktop screen, so your mind gets lost in the minute details while you are thinking of the image as a whole piece of art. It thus secretly appears to you as a sacred and mystical illusion in your mind. Do you agree? – Amorella

         2322 hours. How do you construct your observation? I read it as if it is as true as your words, yet the words are not from me because I am too close to my inner self to work such a construction. This is a very odd observation in itself, but yes, I agree this is exactly as I ‘see/read’ the object in my mind. In every sense of the word this observation separates ‘you, the Amorella’ from me, Richard. Yet, I remain of sound mind and more important to me, free to my own thoughts as you are free to yours. (2327)

         Post. Welcome to the New Year, boy, 2015 by your calendar. – Amorella

         2328 hours. What is your calendar, Amorella?

         Being. 

No comments:

Post a Comment