Notes - I cannot know /

         Here it is almost time for bed and you spent most of the day cleaning the house, reading, working on the family tree, watching the DVR or napping. – Amorella

         2156 hours. Three lines about sum the day. I did clean up the bedroom and steam clean the floors in two bathrooms and the kitchen. More tomorrow in case Carol’s sisters and our niece decide to come down for the day while they are in Ohio this next seven days – providing they arrive by air sometime tomorrow. I did get in my 40 minutes of exercises today for the first time this week. I think this snowstorm is going to be light on us this time. It looks like we have an inch of new snow so far. The prediction is two to four inches for Mason, but below the river they may have up to ten inches. We didn’t even get in the car today – a rare experience for us.

         I have been reading about how the next big thing is going to be direct interactions between computers and our brains – a sort of wireless headset with one entangled in the other. A few think it will be the end of humankind as we are a biology that thinks; in a hundred years we may have a non-biological thinker. What does a non-biological thinker think independently? What can a non-biological thinker think independently?

         Here I am working on a segment story 20,000 years in a  future and they don’t have a non-biological thinker think independently; that is, Ship and the other fellow who works with the cleric think in relationship to themselves and people; they are in a sense attached to people in much the same way cats identify with humans. Cats are hunters though because they are biology. Ship is not biology but he considers himself a ‘companion’ of the biological thinker not an ‘independent non-biological thinker’. So, how did the marsupial humanoids resolve this problem of directly connecting with machinery that thinks for itself as well as thinks in terms of its ‘companion status’ with biological thinkers? (2216)

         Something to think on, boy. – Post. – Amorella

         2218 hours. Here’s a thought – let's say you are a non-biological thinker, Amorella.

         In this context I, Amorella, am a spiritually oriented thinker. I am not in ‘companion status’ with human biology. I am in companion status with your human spirituality at the moment but not in all human moments or at all points of existence. I am a Betweener, the spiritual equivalent, as it were, of Schrödinger's Cat, at least as far as you are concerned. - Amorella

         2232 hours. Would it be possible to create a non-biological being that would have a human equivalent heartansoulanmind (in this blog context)?

         I cannot know the answer to this, and I cannot speculate or imagine such a possibility. Post. - Amorella