20 July 2017

Notes - You leave me alone, wordless.


       Nearly noon. You are waiting for Rich G. and Dave W. at the New Krishna on Route 42 in Sharonville. - Amorella

       1156 hours. It has been awhile since we were here, and I haven't seen either one since.

       Earlier you spent about twenty minutes digging your MacBook software innards trying successfully to bring back your Internet. - Amorella

       1202 hours. I finally figured it out. I don't jump into these things that often.

       You have been home half an hour or so. You  had good conversation with Rich and Dave along with a good Indian lunch. Carol is on the phone with Linda as they are having their wills updated today. You are thinking about heading down to Best Buy for a lookabout.

       1812 hours. I took a much needed nap instead. This is one of the subtle aspects of aging. I have needed naps since 1979.

       You had an egg salad sandwich and a few chips for supper while watching NBC News, then ABC News, then the first episode of the "Bosch" third season on Amazon Prime followed by the first half of "Rachel Maddow" on MSNBC before Carol headed upstairs to read and you turn it off and cleaned the kitty litter box, one of your few self-prescribed daily chores. - Amorella

       2141 hours. You are very good at describing my day, Amorella

       I am because although you woke up debating whether you are presently an "existential transcendentalist" or a "transcendental existentialist". - Amorella

       2143 hours. Right, I did that thinking about how I resolve these things hypothetically, by asking myself the question alone before an Angel of G-D. I do this because I want an honest answer to who I am. I don't revel in this, I need the question resolved.

       This is the crux of a seemingly deep seated question between your heart and soul, not your mind. - Amorella

       2148 hours. Another surprise. I didn't ask here because I wasn't thinking about it. Why would you say this is an argument between heart and soul and not mind? I would assume that it was an underlying argument between either heart and mind or soul and mind -- although seeing this in front of me I cannot image having an argument between soul and mind because I would acquis my soul having a quality of reasoning powers greater than my mind. I can imagine such an argument; however, a common argument between heart and soul has a greater sense of common humanity in it. The heart can take on the soul; a mind can take on a heart; but a mind cannot take on the soul. (2158)

       This above example of thinking shows you to be what, an existential transcendental or a transcendental existentialist? - Amorella

       2159 hours. I don't know. I hadn't thought about it until I read it. I'm not even sure it makes sense in context.

       2201 hours. If the mind cannot take on the soul then I am an existentially oriented transcendentalist. The soul rules the mind; the humanity in the heart raises the bar and allows heartfelt reason alone to argue with the soul. I am therefore, at present in my mind, an existential transcendentalist. - rho (2205)

       This is how and who you are. Your heartanmind can take on your soul; your mind alone cannot. Grammatically, you cannot truthfully change the order of heartanmind. Mindanheart is not a personal reality. Do you agree? - Amorella

       2211 hours. I agree. Heartanmind is. Mindanheart is not.

       Post. - Amorella

       2212 hours. I resolved something tonight, something I had not considered since morning.

       You needed no hypothetical Angel of G-D here, orndorff. All you needed was for me to present the question in such a way that you could resolve it for yourself. - Amorella

       2214 hours. Whoa, Amorella. Your comment sounds almost blasphemous.

       Why, boy? You are the one first suggesting a hypothetical Angel of G-D not me. - Amorella

       2218 hours. Indeed. I had not thought. I went back and underlined what I had said (to myself). What I said was untrue. I do not think/debate with a hypothetical Angel of G-D present. These internal debates are with, in my heartansoulanmind, an Angel of G-D. This is the real reason I am an existential transcendentalist. - rho

       Now you can post with self-honest without a hint of arrogance. - Amorella

       2225 hours. You leave me alone, wordless.

       You are not alone, boy. You are enwrapped in your heartansoulanmind. Let that be a lesson to you. - Amorella


No comments:

Post a Comment