26 May 2012

Notes - day to day / Lesson Two / Lesson Three / an afterthought

         Mid-morning. You picked up the mail and are waiting for Carol at Kroger’s on Tylersville. After nine you will pick up the bedroom shade and hang it. Tim had mowed and all looks well at home. You bought a paper and have it read. Here comes Carol.

         You had a nap, then lunch at Potbelly’s in Kenwood and now you are waiting for Carol at the south lot of Macy’s on a very warm late May afternoon. Carol is all for a nap herself once home.

         I don’t have much on mind, Amorella other than I think I’m going to enjoy learning about the soul first as it appears first, but perhaps higher consciousness should be defined first. It seems best to start with definitions. Although when I look over a posting someone has read for the day, I discover that you have used analogies before and I do not have them documented in any kind of order as far as heartansoulanmind are concerned. What should I do here?

         Let’s begin fresh as this ‘unit’ is from a broader perspective which may be used in the books (which is what the earlier note materials are about). You need to have a foundation beginning with heartansoulanmind from the perspective of an outsider such as the alien AC. Your old storyteller friend-in-arms, Joseph Campbell, the mythologist once suggested that there needs to be a new mythology for the modern age. So, why not begin with that assumption, only we are also including a ‘higher consciousness’ that is apart from the human bio-chemical perspective. It may be a ‘reach’ but why not? What do you think? – Amorella

         That’s fine. I have not thought about Campbell for a while. I remember the episode I used to use in class where he speaks of this – it concludes with a image of the earth (from space) and he mentions there are no borders, etc. in the image. I liked that. It is presumptuous of me to attempt such a field as metaphysics, but then Braided Dreams, Running Through, Merlyn’s Mind is fairly presumptuous also, as well as conjuring up a fictional ancient and a modern rebellion in HeavenOrHellBothOrNeither. Maybe it’s arrogance. I don’t know, but using imagination to think on new human perspectives doesn’t appear immoral. I just don’t want to be writing for the wrong (moral) reason. – rho

         And so lights your false pride with a shot of arrogance to boot the reflection. – Amorella

         Someone once said the road to hell is paved with good intentions and I see some truth in it.

         I assure you, boy, the only intention here is to enlighten yourself with a stronger sense of human mythology, of human projection through storytelling. – Amorella

         I am too cautious.

         You have good reason. – Amorella

         I am in full understanding of your point. The experience was real enough.

         And for months too, boy. A lesson in the real world you will not too soon forget. Drop in “Higher Consciousness” from Wikipedia Offline, that will do here. I will do the adapting and editing – non-denominational; this definition is philosophical in spirit and without a specific religious affiliation. - Amorella

** **

Higher Consciousness . . . refers to spiritual awareness or knowledge. Evolution in this sense is not that which occurs by natural selection over generations of human reproduction but evolution brought about by the application of spiritual knowledge to the conduct of human life, and of mental proficiency brought about by spiritual practices. Through the application of such knowledge to practical self-management, the awakening and development of faculties dormant in the ordinary human being is achieved. These faculties are aroused by and developed in conjunction with certain virtues such as lucidity, patience, kindness, truthfulness, humility, and forgiveness towards one's fellow man – qualities without which, according to the traditional teachings, higher consciousness is not possible.
Edited and adapted from Wikipedia Offline for use as a general definition of higher consciousness in relationship to Amorella’s systematic metaphysical concept: heartansoulanmind.

** **

         I find this adapted definition from Wikipedia acceptable for my personal use and feel better employing it as a systematic building block to Amorella’s metaphysical heartansoulanmind concept.

         This is a personal internal working study, orndorff, and it may be amended.  – Amorella

         Your comment directly above strikes me as a weakness.

         This is because you want something written in stone even though you [humans] are not so nearly hard written yourselves. From my perspective the closest thing to such a styled stone writing is your name on a gravestone. Capiche? This ends Lesson Two. Post. - Amorella





         Later. 2015 hours. Carol and I watched the last of the year episodes of “The Mentalist” and ABC News and had a hamburger, veggies and fruit for supper. She is presently getting caught up on “The Firm”.

         I have never written “capiche” before in my life. Certainly never in any notes or postings. It boggles my mind sometimes, but that is the last word that popped out. And, I had no idea Lesson Two was over. I ‘heard’ the “Capiche?” in my head – sounded like it came from an old gangster movie or even an old “Seinfeld” episode.

         You know, Amorella’s comment about a possible amendment to the definition of Higher Consciousness still sounds like a weakness, like she is unsure, or worse, it is me internally unconsciously hedging my bet. That’s what I was thinking – ‘I am making this up as I go along and I am hedging my bets,’ that is exactly what made me write it down. It was “me” being the weakness, not Amorella.

         And that is what you didn’t get at the time; the anger was misdirected towards me and therefore it was false in context. – Amorella

         How do I correct this oversight, this misdirected anger at the moment it happens, Amorella?

         You are leaning towards false pride, boy, towards being better, towards being ‘more’ perfect. – Amorella

         Self-punishment is learned just as punishment for or out of guilt is learned. It is instilled by many traditional cultural sources with initial good intentions. – Amorella

         You want to ask: “What can be done about it?” but you are afraid of the traditional response not the radical one. – Amorella

         The traditional response generally brings about a radical response that the survivors end up paying for one way or another. Violence. Revenge. Something to that effect. World War II comes to mind. We like to kill the pig then we eat the bacon. So much for scapegoats.

         Think about this just above, a traditional orndorff response. Next you’ll evoke the Communist Revolution, The Lord of the Flies (which was the initial thought that lead to ‘kill the pig’ then [We like] then [eat the bacon] . . . that was the thought’s original construction.

         Nothing new is there. How depressing.

         You need to realize the chains that imprison your humanity. – Amorella

         The soul is not imprisoned, is it?

         “Imprisonment” is not a word in the soul’s figurative vocabulary. – Amorella

         How does the soul ‘see’ the human heart?

         Let’s end Lesson Three by rephrasing the question: How does the soul exist? Leaving among other things such as the heart, out of it. – Amorella

         This is a jump into the deep end of the pool, Amorella. (2100)

         As usual, you have no idea, boy. Post. - Amorella


        1048 hours. An Afterthought. I had a long soaking bath then sat down and read what Wikipedia says about the “soul”. I do not pretend to know any of that material. The subject of the definition of a soul is mind-boggling. I am not a philosopher I only took one class in philosophy in graduate school, none in undergraduate. I cannot imagine where Amorella is coming from or what she will talk about. I am like a fellow who is talking about jumping into the deep end of the pool without his having the tiniest bit of knowledge of what water is.

         What you say is indeed true, boy, you have no real idea what a soul is; you only know in general what other notable human beings say it is or what it is not. Post. - Amorella

25 May 2012

Notes - a short lesson on my false pride / Chaucer / Lesson One /

         0856 hours. Already packing for tonight’s home drive for the long weekend. Our window shade for the bedroom is restrung and ready to pick up tomorrow. This six by six black and gray abstract up and down, down and up shade is twenty years old (we still like it) but the strings were frayed and worn perhaps they won’t break for another twenty years.

         No doubt you’ll break before the strings, boy. – Amorella

         The odds are certainly on your side, Amorella.

         You were interrupted and taken by Matt Lauer’s interview with Bobby Brown and his family on the NBC Today Show. You are concerned it is a distraction to your writing but I am still “channeling on”, orndorff. – Amorella

         You are funny, Amorella. I don’t know how you can do this.

         The interview segment sunk into your heart, dude, thus the interview and I were in the same spot. – Amorella

         I feel like I was impolite.

         You do not understand how this works. In a sense the word ‘metaphysics’ works well to describe the internal humanity center.

         The flash of a three-leaf clover pops into mind.



         The above image is your first pick; below is mine. The difference is in our perspective. Are you following? – Amorella


         My focus is on an ideal, a Platonic Form, if you will. Yours is more naturally oriented. I think you are closer to the soul. My human heart has a tendency to make the small pebble (clover) in the sandal feel much (more perfect) larger.

         Oddly stated. – Amorella

         I am thinking it is my false pride (in having a heartansoulanmind to begin with) that stuck me to the first image.

         You are learning. Post. - Amorella





         Before noon and you have run several errands and you and Brennan (sleeping) are currently waiting on Carol who is a few feet away grocery shopping for Kim in Giant Eagle. You had a Jennifer cookie and Carol a lemon blueberry scone from On The Rise bakery on Fairmont for brunch.

         Those three-leaf clovers above aren’t very subtle. What implied visual differences in thought, not the least of which is one in many rather than a glorified singular one in the first. You do see things differently than me. You are (certainly in context) more soul-oriented than heart.

         I am a gift delivered from the soul, boy; thus my orientation. – Amorella        

         I accept this. No argument from me on the topic. I want to see this heartansoulanmind system from your perspective. No harm in gaining a new perspective.

         No indeed. Living or Dead this is how one may acquire an understanding if nothing else. These books, blogs and lessons are specifically for you, but all is expected to be sharable online. – Amorella

         That’s fine, Amorella. We continue as we have been. I’m a retired teacher, but I’ve never retired from being a student. – rho

         Nor do you wish to be. You and Bob have favorite lines from Chaucer. You both are (in your heart, thus present tense). Here are the Clerk’s [Student’s] introductory lines from “The Prologue”:

** **

THE CLERK'S PORTRAIT 


A clerk ther was of oxenford also, 

That unto logyk hadde longe ygo. 

As leene was his hors as is a rake, 

And he nas nat right fat, I undertake, 

But looked holwe, and therto sobrely. 

Ful thredbare was his overeste courtepy; 

For he hadde geten hym yet no benefice, 

Ne was so worldly for to have office. 

For hym was levere have at his beddes heed 

Twenty bookes, clad in blak or reed, 

Of aristotle and his philosophie, 

Than robes riche, or fithele, or gay sautrie. 

But al be that he was a philosophre,
Yet hadde he but litel gold in cofre; 

But al that he myghte of his freendes hente, 

On bookes and on lernynge he it spente, 

And bisily gan for the soules preye
Of hem that yaf hym wherwith to scoleye. 

Of studie took he moost cure and moost heede, 

Noght o word spak he moore than was neede, 

And that was seyd in forme and reverence, 

And short and quyk and ful of hy sentence; 

Sownynge in moral vertu was his speche, 

And gladly wolde he lerne and gladly teche.

Geoffrey Chaucer. Prologue to The Canterbury Tales         
** **

         Politely accepted in intent for the both of us and many other such student-like personalities in this world and perhaps also in many others.

         Understood. Post. - Amorella



         1616 hours. I had a nap of sorts, the car is packed and the car windows and head and taillights are washed and cleaned for the trip (although the car itself is quite dirty). I found a couple errors on this posting and corrected them. I find it strange that I am not so combative with myself on this. I feel like I am starting a new course. I plan to listen in take in what you say and think before I react.

         You wish to take this internal metaphysics as a course with me as the instructor? – Amorella

         This is the way I was brought up. I feel more comfortable this way. Besides, I don’t enjoy group work or group instruction so much. It is not efficient. One on one is good though.

         One on one is the way it will be, young man. Good to see you more positive, although I note your hangman’s humor is not buried too deep. – Amorella

         It is mostly so that I will not become entrapped by my own thoughts and experiences. I am curious. The metaphysical system is set first with the image of the cloverleaf (heart and soul and mind), thus for me the heart is on the left, soul in the middle and mind in the right leaf. Or, is there a soul-stem, similar to the brainstem as far as humans are concerned?

         Lets keep this broader than for humans or marsupial humanoids – the stem is (as) consciousness, the longer the stem the more consciousness, the broader probability for the three leaves because of the stronger stem to ‘carry’ the ‘weight’. It makes no difference which leaf is which. You are thinking left to right because of how you were instructed to read. The soul does not have to be in the middle, a ‘middle’ only exists because you think it is so. Always keep in mind Diplomat’s Ameta Cortavena, tiny AC, snug as a bug in a rug. Where’s the middle in that? - Amorella


        
         It is 1647 hours and Kim should be home within a half hour. I think this is interesting.

         What have you learned? – Amorella

         I am learning to first think outside the ‘human’ box. I don’t know what AC would consider the most important other than efficiency.

         It is and has been of worthy thought and consideration both internally and externally in AC’s case. Metaphysics is equally worthy of thought and consideration, as much so as physics as far as the AC’s are concerned. – Post and shut down for the day. More tomorrow as nature permits. – Amorella

         Why are you using ‘nature’ rather than ‘time’ here? (1656)

         To remind you of what you have learned today. Post. - Amorella

24 May 2012

Notes - No question about it / Ameta Cortavena / Ouija board & ideomotor response

         Within thirty minutes of noon. An easy day so far. Brennan took a nap while you and Carol watched last night’s “Revenge”. Then you took Brennan on a walk around the block, as it is cool and sunny. His next feeding will be within the hour. Carol is on the couch reading her Barbara DeLinsky novel and you are in the easy chair facing the front, east window. Interruption from Brennan as it is time for his liquid refreshment.

         I was wondering before sleep last night what kind of system to put heartansoulanmind in relative to an individual of the Homo sapiens, as it appears non-dimensional, ha! Non-denominational.

         You are keeping your humor intact. This is a good thing. – Amorella

         Since you brought it up let’s broaden this to include the two sets of aliens in the Merlyn books, the marsupial-humanoids and the tiny alien Diplomat discovered. She calls herorhim “AC” but classifies herorhim as Ameta Cortavena which translates as “Consciousness-Near-Nothing” or “Heart of Nothing”. Diplomat is attempting to convince the reader of Merlyn’s Mind that she has discovered who is really writing the work within “Pouch Text”. She believes this little character is the writer behind Richard. She thinks, I, Amorella, is this tiny alien character. Below is from Merlyn's Mind, Chapter Eight, Pouch Text.

*** ***
I, Diplomat, as a hybrid character in two books, was created by Richard’s mind. The outside-the-book reader, as well as Richard, would certainly agree I was created in his mind before venturing onto the two-dimensional page. As I was created in his mind, I may make reference to it as being one who is continually a part of his mind as he writes, thus, I am in two places at once, one I am on paper, and two I am in Richard’s mind as he types this.

 My mind model is based on the following principles for analogy with Richard’s mind, specifically where the stories originated and are in the mode of being created, written, and proofed. This is my criteria for discovering this super-microscopic alien with a consciousness I have nicknamed the little benign fellow AC. The nickname means Alien (Alternating) Current, since he’s here, then he isn’t, like the self-relative sentence: “When you are reading this sentence I wrote it.” The personification, the alien I, if you will, leaves a trail of words to trail or track back on, either way.

The author, Richard, is relying on the Soki (who he thinks is the personification of his writing process and not an alien life form) to do the writing. He cannot argue what he has not pre-thought.

The Soki is presently in what position related to the mind model? Let’s see, she thought.

            > I, the Soki, am in the south room and exist as the hypothetical and imaginary outer blue walls of that room. I am the sole aromatic oven, the personification of the writing process who pumps the aromas Richard puts into letter and word combinations. I am imagination within reason, created to do the task of unconscious or automatic writing. The blue south pointing walls of the model are hypothetical. They are not alien. The outer walls of the south room are my position relative to the model. That is where I see myself for those who are curious. <

            Imagination is also a disguise to hide behind, thought Diplomat. What a better device for the Soki. A virtual chameleon of poetic devices to hide one’s self in. How like my own mind, she thought. How like any human mind, to hide oneself in her or his imagination. Where is the real heart of the humanity when it may be nothing but imagination in the lowly human beast? The complications of this literary search are great, but I am resolved to finish what I begin. Perhaps the alien in any of us is that we don’t want to admit to. A perfect cover for anyone looking in the mirror and saying, “Who are you really? And then, “why are you here?” No response, or an imaginary one at best. The absurdity is not of life, but is of consciousness instead.           

A Beginning Hypothetical Alien Profile


            I will make this alien a female so as not to confuse her with the male that I made of the Soki. This stands to reason because early on in the books the Soki is referred to by the marsupialese pronoun sheorhe. The alien is a creature who evolved from the size of a single dandelion seed or less. The species became smaller and smaller until one could fit inside a marsupial or human brain.

The alien is from this galaxy. Her species originally lived on a planet and feed from the humidity and carbon dioxide in the air and from the oxygen/carbon dioxide cycle from grassy plants. Her remote ancestors had no legs or arms. No eyes. No ears. None of the human senses existed. The species originally lived between the grass blades as a spore might. Then the species developed from a single asexual seed blown in the wind to a higher state of consciousness.

This alien ancestor sensed the material world through a cone that goes inward from the top of the seed. The actual seed surface or skin continually flaked onto the grassy stems which allowed it to lodge itself within as a small mollusk might lodge itself in an empty shell. The winds blow these dandelion seed size creatures from place to place within the planet’s environment. These intelligent creatures learned to roll in pieces of dead grasses and adjust by bobbing and rolling the dead blade of grass so the wind might catch them so they might raise themselves higher and higher into the sky and become more conscious of height, width and depth.

Much later, aliens, such as the marsupials, landed on their grassy and environmentally friendly world from time to time and some of the fully conscious (as in human and marsupial consciousness) seedlings attach themselves to the marsupial and/or other ships piloted by yet other aliens of consciousness in the galaxy.

These tiny creatures further refined themselves smaller and smaller because it was to their benefit of survival, down until they were the size of self generating amoebas, only one of their species might then needed on any planet for further propagation.

Eventually through divine design or evolution their outer shell becomes a transparency that can be seen through like clear glass. Because it would at times reflect sunlight it would seem to be a sparkle in the air when airborne and then be gone. A little sparkle of reflected light as hardly a speck of dust perhaps, and thus the minute alien still easily and neatly disguised itself and kept safe from harm.

As these tiny amoeba-like creatures traveled the galaxy they became smaller and smaller as their adaptive minds became larger and larger. Eventually they become microbe small, but the mind stays its original size. It is my contention that this alien masking as the Soki, who is, in turn, masking as the writing process personified, the one in Richard’s head, is less than a hydrogen atom in size, but its mind is the same size it always was, or even perhaps a bit larger because its awareness of proper hosts and environments in which to survive as a single member of a vast species.

 This sub-microscopic creature can move to whatever shape she desires within her host. All she needs is a whiff of carbon dioxide and oxygen in her food and air supplement cycle. She is very efficient little creature.

This may not be complete accurate as a hypothesis, but it allows her fits the intelligent profile needed for such a small alien species to exist undiscovered within a marsupial or human host.


Carrying this profile further, let’s say the one disguised as the Soki, was left on Earth when the marsupials first landed in 1988. It could not divide on Earth because it has nothing left to divide into. The alien species had reached its cul-de-sac of evolution. She is one of a kind on this planet, a unique species that has found herself in the head of the author, Richard. She can do nothing of herself, nor does she need to for survival, as long as she has a host, who could be any human being or marsupial. She can only make herself known to her host telepathically through her own mental consciousness.

The Soki, the personified writing process, is, meanwhile, completely telepathic within the confines of his host. He needs nothing else to survive as an alien consciousness either. Knowledge to survive his environment is also gathered from the brain of his host. Both make complete sense as atom-sized intelligent parasites.

This particular little alien who disguises herself as the Soki (whom the author considers a product of his imagination) can exist for a very long time on Earth as long as she has a human host. If she happens to be in a host who is more than likely to be killed then she must transfer. She must therefore prefers to be in urban areas, where ironically, she finds herself in a more dangerous environment, but there are a greater amount of hosts available. And, since the eye socket seems to be of some significance, perhaps the transfer is through the eye stem directly into the brain. This is all supposition of course, but I feel it is plausible under the circumstances.

Here is the scenario I have devised as to why she might choose to risk her disguise for her survival’s sake. Earth is a dangerous world for the little creature. Her greatest fear is having everyone die off like early on in the first book in 1988. Only four people left. Not very good odds of surviving. To increase these odds, and after having been hosted by a marsupial before coming to earth.

The alien’s electron-sized brain easily disguises the Soki’s immediate human environment, a mental presence, in the brain, of a personification of the writing process within the host. The Soki, as a presence of mind through the interaction with the brain, becomes her front and back yard so to speak. And, as with a self relative sentence, when she (the alien) is observed in the brain, she disappears as something else again, and reappears only when the observer is not looking.

Thus, her built in defense system is extremely miniscule, remote, and self-referential. She is the most efficient piece of conscious life in the universe, and it is nearly as old. She has no harming capacities of any kind because she needs conscious life to co-exist with. She is an almost perfect alien form as far as basic survival of a consciousness or self-awareness is concerned.

            I will call this alien, thought Diplomat, Ameta Cortavena which translates as Consciousness-Near-Nothing or Heart-of-Nothing, because when she is one, then she is not the other. No one knows which this tiny benign alien is at any given time for when observed she becomes the other. A perfectly constructed defensive system built in. If there is a plausibility of an intelligent alien at all this fits her profile description.

From: Orndorff’s Merlyn’s Mind, Chapter Eight. Section III: Pouch Text

***

         Diplomat really got into her proofs of an alien writing the books forgetting that from the reader’s perspective she is an alien too. I like the humor, but then, I would. No one gets this stuff, Amorella. I had a really good time writing these first three books. I was on a mission.

         Like the “Blues Brothers” – we’re on a mission from God. – Amorella

         Not quite, Amorella, but that was funny too. I loved the movie at the time, in fact I have the DVD version, but over the years it has lost some of its charm. No mission from G---D, Amorella.  – This is a trick statement isn’t it?

         So, how are you going to get out of it? – Amorella

         Here’s what I don’t like. Everyone and his sister and brother thinks sheorhe is on some sort of mission from G---D. Talk about arrogance. It doesn’t even make sense to me. Manifest Destiny. The self-pride jumps right out at me, right along with Predestination, which is in conflict with Free Will, at least in my mind. People can think what they want but when anyone starts thinking sheorhe is on a mission for G---D social problems compound themselves into economic problems and somewhere out there someone invents a scapegoat, usually secretly siding with the devil. In this day and age it is a no-win for anyone in the long run. I’m not an existentialist for nothing. Anyone who thinks sheorhe is on a mission from G---D can leave me out of it. – rho

         Truly spoken words, orndorff. No question about it. Understanding where you are coming from this makes complete sense. You want to get back to business but I need a break. Be back in a bit. Post. – Amorella

         I can’t remember the last time you needed a break, if ever. That’s fine with me. I could use a nap.



        1642 hours. I did have a nap. Brennan is up and has just finished his bottle. He is ‘baby-playing’ in his little rug area just north of my feet on the floor. Back to the tiny alien “AC” for short. Alien Current or Alternating Current – so shocking a thought. This is so bad. I don’t know where my mind is. ‘lie’ sets between a and n. That should tell me something. Similar to ‘evil’ with a ‘d’ in front. I better stop while I’m ahead.

         Word play has always been fun for you because of its inherent possibilities for a new combination of thoughts – somewhat like a built in Ouija board. – Amorella

** **
From Wikipedia:

The Ouija board also known as a spirit board or talking board, is a flat board marked with the letters of the alphabet, the numbers 0-9, the words "yes", "no", "hello" and "goodbye" and various symbols and graphics. . . . It uses a planchette (small heart-shaped piece of wood) or movable indicator to indicate the spirit's message by spelling it out on the board during a séance. Participants place their fingers on the planchette and it is moved about the board to spell out words. . . . Following its commercial introduction by businessman Elijah Bond on July 1, 1890, the Ouija board was regarded as a harmless parlor game unrelated to the occult until American Spiritualist Pearl Curran popularized its use as a divining tool during World War I.
Mainstream religions and some occultists have associated use of the Ouija board with the threat of demonic possession and some have cautioned their followers not to use Ouija boards.
While Ouija believers feel the paranormal or supernatural is responsible for Ouija's action, it may be parsimoniously explained by unconscious movements of those controlling the pointer, a psychophysiological phenomenon known as the ideomotor effect. Despite being repeatedly debunked by the efforts of the scientific community and denounced as a tool of Satan by conservative Christians, Ouija remains popular among many people.

History

One of the first mentions of the automatic writing method used in the Ouija board is found in China around 1100 AD, in historical documents of the Song Dynasty. The method was known as fuji 扶乩 "planchette writing". The use of planchette writing as a means of ostensibly contacting the dead and the spirit-world continued, and, albeit under special rituals and supervisions, was a central practice of the Quanzhen School, until it was forbidden by the Qing Dynasty. Several entire scriptures of the Daozang are supposedly works of automatic planchette writing. Similar methods of mediumistic spirit writing have been widely practiced in ancient India, Greece, Rome, and medieval Europe.
Academic

The Ouija phenomenon has been criticized by many scientists as a hoax related to the ideomotor response. Various studies have been produced, recreating the effects of the Ouija board in the lab and showing that, at least under laboratory conditions, the subjects were moving the planchette involuntarily. Detractors have described Ouija board users as 'operators'. Some critics noted that the messages ostensibly spelled out by spirits were similar to whatever was going through the minds of the subjects.

Use in creation of literature

Ouija boards have been the source of inspiration for literary works, used as guidance in writing, or as a form of channeling literary works. As a result of Ouija boards becoming popular in the early 20th century, by the 1920s many "psychic" books were written of varying quality often initiated by Ouija board use. . . .
In 1982, poet James Merrill released an apocalyptic 560-page epic poem entitled The Changing Light at Sandover, which documented two decades of messages dictated from the ouija board during séances hosted by Merrill and his partner David Noyes Jackson. Sandover, which received the National Book Critics Circle Award in 1983, was published in three volumes beginning in 1976. The first contained a poem for each of the letters A through Z, and was called The Book of Ephraim. It appeared in the collection Divine Comedies, which won the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry in 1977. According to Merrill, the spirits ordered him to write and publish the next two installments, Mirabell: Books of Number in 1978 (which won the National Book Award for Poetry) and Scripts for the Pageant in 1980.
Edited from Wikipedia – Ouija board
** **

         You do not remember reading this before though you have mentioned such things in the blog. Below you have Wikipedia’s “Ideomotor response” article and you feel you know this exactly as this is a good definition of what I, Amorella, work through within your physical and mental systems.

**  **
Ideomotor response
            Hypnosis            

The ideo-motor response (or "ideo-motor reflex"), often abbreviated to IMR, is a concept in hypnosis and psychological research. It is derived from the terms “ideo" (idea, or mental representation) and "motor" (muscular action). The phrase is most commonly used in reference to the process whereby a thought or mental image brings about a seemingly "reflexive" or automatic muscular reaction, often of minuscule degree, and potentially outside of the awareness of the subject. The cognate term "ideo-dynamic response" (or "reflex") extends to the description of all bodily reactions caused in a similar manner by certain ideas, e.g., the salivation often caused by imagining sucking a lemon, which is a secretory response. Here, "ideo-dynamic" means "the power of an idea (over the body)". In the Victorian psychological terminology from which this concept derives, an "idea" may include any mental representation, e.g., a mental image or memory, etc. The ideo-dynamic response became the original neuro-psychological theory of suggestion in hypnotism.
History

The term "ideo-motor reflex" or "ideo-motor response" was introduced in the 1840s by the eminent Victorian physiologist and psychologist William Benjamin Carpenter. Carpenter was a friend and collaborator of James Braid, the founder of hypnotism.
Braid soon assimilated the ideo-motor theory into hypnotism and it became the central theory of hypnotic suggestion. In The Physiology of Fascination (1855), Braid writes,
“In order that I may do full justice to two esteemed friends, I beg to state, in connection with this term monoideo-dynamics, that, several years ago, Dr. W. B. Carpenter introduced the term ideo-motor to characterise the reflex or automatic muscular motions which arise merely from ideas associated with motion existing in the mind, without any conscious effort of volition. In 1853, in referring to this term, Dr. Noble said, “Ideo-dynamic would probably constitute a phraseology more appropriate, as applicable to a wider range of phenomena.” In this opinion I quite concurred, because I was well aware that an idea could arrest as well as excite motion automatically, not only in the muscles of voluntary motion, but also as regards the condition of every other function of the body. I have, therefore, adopted the term monoideo-dynamics, as still more comprehensive and characteristic as regards the true mental relations which subsist during all dynamic changes which take place, in every other function of the body, as well as in the muscles of voluntary motion."
Braid coined the term "monoideo-dynamic" to express his theory that hypnotism functioned primarily by concentrating attention upon a single (mono) "dominant idea", which he believed amplified the ideo-dynamic or ideo-motor response.

The ideo-motor reflex. Diagram from Carpenter's The Principles of Mental Physiology (1874).

Questioning

It is strongly associated with the practice of hypnosis, whereby 'yes' or 'no' answers may be given by indication of a physical manifestation rather than a verbal one; such results are produced by 'pre-suggesting' the correct response and attaching it to either the left or right hand side of the subject's body.
An example of IMR

If you were to be asked to imagine doing up your shoelaces as vividly as possible, your brain would consciously fixate on the task and work through it as vividly and as logically as possible. The theory of IMR would imply that your muscular memory associated with your hands, would then attempt the task physically, but abort the process unless it was truly necessary and curtail the events that would unfold if you were actually willing to send the complete information along your nervous system to your hands. This may therefore involve an involuntary 'twitch' or movement of the associated digits are placed into preparation of function, processed against reality and then given the signal to not actually act.
In hypnosis, this may be circumvented by dissociating the particular thought-process-response-abort of a digit or entire limb; and therefore give control to the unconscious mind to enable (by suggestion) the route of conscious thought-unconscious process-conscious process (of the fact)-conscious response (do not act)- unconscious response (dissociate from conscious)- ignore abortive conscious attempt- unconscious unabort... Which would then display a reaction or response in a physical manner or behavioral context.
Body language may be considered the most commonly visible aspect of IMR, but may also include such unconscious activities as doodling or art - as the conscious thought is sublimated into a different type of activity in unconscious expression.

From: Wikipedia
** **

         And, from the Skeptic’s Dictionary below:

** **
            ideomotor effect
The ideomotor effect refers to the influence of suggestion or expectation on involuntary and unconscious motor behavior. The movement of pointers on Ouija boards, of a facilitator's hands in facilitated communication, of hands and arms in applied kinesiology, and of some behaviors attributed to hypnotic suggestion, are due to ideomotor action.
Ray Hyman (1999) has demonstrated the seductive influence of ideomotor action on medical quackery, where it has produced such appliances as the "Toftness Radiation Detector" (used by chiropractors) and "black boxes" used in medical radiesthesia and radionics (popular with naturopaths to harness "energy" used in diagnosis and healing.) Hyman also argues that such things as Qi Gong and "pulse diagnosis," popular in both Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurvedic medicine as practiced by Deepak Chopra, are best explained in terms of ideomotor action and require no supposition of mysterious energies such as chi.
The term "ideomotor action" was coined by William B. Carpenter in 1852 in his explanation for the movements of rods and pendulums by dowsers, and some table turning or lifting by spirit mediums (the ones that weren't accomplished by cheating). Carpenter argued that muscular movement can be initiated by the mind independently of volition or emotions. We may not be aware of it, but suggestions can be made to the mind by others or by observations. Those suggestions can influence the mind and affect motor behavior.
Scientific tests by American psychologist William James, French chemist Michel Chevreul, English scientist Michael Faraday (Zusne and Jones 1989: 111), and American psychologist Ray Hyman have demonstrated that many phenomena attributed to spiritual or paranormal forces, or to mysterious "energies," are actually due to ideomotor action. Furthermore, these tests demonstrate that "honest, intelligent people can unconsciously engage in muscular activity that is consistent with their expectations" (Hyman 1999). They also show suggestions that guide behavior can be given by subtle cues (Hyman 1977).

From: The Sceptic’s Dictionary online

** **

         I particularly like the lines: “. . . tests demonstrate that "honest, intelligent people can unconsciously engage in muscular activity that is consistent with their expectations." This is the method Amorella adheres to and it suggests that “Amorella” was/is an unconscious expectation (and, to me, she is a poetic personification of my “automatic writing central”. The post today sooths my way to continue with my experimental writing that focuses on the books and blog. Why not? The only difference is that where “their expectations” exists one can readily see many of the expectations (suggestions) are from Amorella first so it should be (in this blog) “Amorella’s expectations”.

            Later, you had Chinese take out for supper, then you spent most of the evening watching Owen learning to drive his new electrified toy Jeep – an early outdoor fun family twilight time. The ‘family’ of heartsansoulsanminds is the focus for tomorrow. What is the connection between higher consciousness and heartansoulanmind no matter what the physical body appears to be or not to be. Post. - Amorella