Notes - a present thesis of balance /

         A rainy and somewhat windy Monday morning and you are thinking it would be a good time to do your exercises, but thinking and doing are two different things. Yesterday you copied the following that I [Amorella] ‘said’ from an earlier post:

        

** **

Perhaps we can use this in book four, The Rebellion. A lead character rebels not against G---D but against what sheorhe considers a false truth about herorhis sense of self. The character has no place to go except to others of the Dead who feel and understand that their predicament or circumstance is that it is seemingly impossible to define one’s sense of self accurately.

It is impossible in life, and impossible in death also. Therefore, says this new leader of the Dead, let us go back into the world of the living so that we the Dead may better find the truth of our circumstances so that we might share this with our children, the Living. What do you think, orndorff?

** **

         What do you think about the above today? – Amorella

         One, who is the character to be? Two, how can going back to the world of the Living help the Dead to better see the truth of their circumstances? Three, are they going to share this ‘truth’ with their children once they are Dead or are they going to share this ‘truth’ with the now Living? Four, what good will it do to share this ‘truth’ in any case? And, five, as it is impossible (in the Merlyn’s Mind series) to ‘know’ who one is, why would an Angel say to the individual Dead (or Living, for that matter), “Who are you?” in the first place? One last series of questions: What is this first Rebellion for? Who does it serve? What can be done? And, how is it the second Rebellion began with the conclusion of Eisenhower’s farewell address? There are a lot of lose ends here. The central focus, I assume, is still on the human species and how it spiritually survives the near future.

         Spiritually surviving ‘any’ future is close enough. The point is to present a form or fulcrum on which to ‘balance’ the heartansoulanmind collectively as well as individually. This is what the Merlyn’s Mind stories are attempting to discover. – Amorella

         That is simply put. Why didn’t you just come out and say this in 2009 or even back in 2005 when I was working on book one?

         You would not have understood as much as you do today. – Amorella

         I feel this needs to be in the blog as an attachment. It gives the blog and books more clarity. Though it is embarrassing for me to embrace this ‘clarity’ at this late date.

         The ‘clarity’ is a matter of understanding not knowledge. Understanding leads to the balance, not knowledge. – Amorella

         Then this needs to be attached too.

         How about this:

         Today, 16 April 2012, Richard is a step closer to understanding what his experimental writing is about in its narrowest sense. For Richard these books and blog are building a personal fulcrum on which to balance the heartansoulanmind individually for a better contentment of the human spirit in the future. Presently, Richard has the circumstance and inclination to continue, so he will. – Amorella


        I am considering your words. I want to make sure they are completely clear as this is a present thesis for the books and blog as I see it.