21 February 2013

Notes - no grammar / primary on rules / rules, 1st draft of Dead 13


         Late morning. You had a nap after breakfast and the paper. Bones in the cold shivers wear you out. You climbed out of a very warm bath a few minutes ago, dressed in clean clothes and you feel better for now. Carol is sitting on the floor with a blanket over her and Jadah the cat; while she is reading The Jefferson Key by Steve Berry, both are warming up.

         In the tub I was thinking about the Dead and how from their perspective in the books, metaphysics is still physics under a different form of light. It lacks gravity for one thing but for the depth of one's heart and mind I suppose. (1104)

         If the Living (who are, at times, seeing reality through heart and mind) filter the light of day through the 'translucence' of the soul, then the science takes on a different perspective, like that of looking through a microscope or telescope gives one a different perspective, sometimes, in real life, a mind-altering perspective of how things really are, or rather how things now seem more apparent to be, than before observing through chosen instruments of science. (1111) This I feel represents a statement on the state of Merlyn's mind before he thinkanspeaks to his audience in "The Dead 13".

         That's more plausible than my thoughts, orndorff. Your humanity provides a filter (as would anyone else's) for me to make the greater story known. - Amorella

         What is the greater story, Amorella?

         To show what the Dead know, young man, to show what the Dead have to do with the Living besides the transplantion of souls from one generation to another. - Amorella

         In the books.

         Of course in the books, boy. How else? What good would any of those do if it were not in a human-framed story form? - Amorella

         Well, so far into volume one of Great Merlyn's Ghost it is much less wordy than Braided Dreams and it says more. I'll give it that.

         You can't make something out of nothing, boy. It doesn't play in physics or metaphysics as we use it in here. - Amorella

         In here there is a First Cause.

         In here, in the books, there is a first cause. - Amorella

         It seems blasphemous not to capitalize it.

         This is to your eyes, not my own (figuratively speaking). - Amorella

         Interesting.

         I suppose it is.

         You have no grammar?

         Being in existence does not demand a grammar. - Amorella

         That's true. A plant, for example, does not speak. (1129)

         Post, young man. - Amorella


         Mid-afternoon. You are at Pine Hill Lakes northern most lot. Carol is on page 93 of The Jefferson Key. You had a late lunch at the 'Rocking Chair' place then stopped at Pets-Mart to see about rooming for Jadah and Ellie if Kim and Paul have not sold their house by the time of your four couple gathering in Texas in April. You will now fly from Columbus to Austin roundtrip with Craig and Alta taking you from and to the airport from the cabin/house you eight are renting.


         First let's gather the ideas Merlyn is going to talk about. Go through the Moral Philosophy of Adler from Wikipedia.

         Aristotle's Ethics are the background; fits well with Elysium.
** **
Mortimer J. Adler's Moral Philosophy in Synopsis:

 First, descriptive truth consists in the agreement or conformity of the mind with reality.

When we think that that which is, is, and that which is not, is not, we think truly. To be true, what we think must conform to the way things are.
Second, in order to avoid the naturalistic fallacy, we must formulate at least one self-evident prescriptive truth, so that, with it as a premise, we can reason to the truth of other prescriptives.
Third, the distinction between real and apparent goods must be understood, as well as the fact that only real goods are the objects of right desire. In the realm of appetite or desire, some desires are natural and some are acquired. Those that are natural are the same for all human beings as individual members of the human species.
Fourth, in all practical matters or matters of conduct, the end precedes the means in our thinking about them, while in action we move from means to ends.
Only a normative end can be final and ultimate. Happiness functions as the end that ought to control all the right choices we make in the course of living. Though we never have happiness ethically understood at any moment of our lives, we are always on the way to happiness if we freely make the choices that we ought to make in order to achieve our ultimate normative end of having lived well.
The fifth condition is that there is not a plurality of moral virtues (which are named in so many ethical treatises), but only one integral moral virtue.

There may be a plurality of aspects to moral virtue, but moral virtue is like a cube with many faces.
In other words, considering the four so-called cardinal virtues – temperance, courage, justice, and prudence – the unity of virtue declares that no one can have any one of these four without also having the other three.

Since justice names an aspect of virtue that is other regarding, while temperance and courage name aspects of virtue that are self-regarding, and both the self- and other regarding aspects of virtue involve prudence in the making of moral choices, no one can be selfish in his right desires without also being altruistic, and conversely.

This explains why a morally virtuous person ought to be just even though his or her being just may appear only to serve the good of others. According to the unity of virtue, the individual cannot have the self-regarding aspects of virtue – temperance and courage – without also having the other regarding aspect of virtue, which is justice.
The sixth and final condition in Adler’s teleological ethics is acknowledging the primacy of the good and deriving the right there from.

Those who assert the primacy of the right make the mistake of thinking that they can know what is right, what is morally obligatory in our treatment of others, without first knowing what is really good for ourselves in the course of trying to live a morally good life.

Only when we know what is really good for ourselves can we know what are our duties or moral obligations toward others. The primacy of the good with respect to the right corrects the mistake of thinking that we are acting morally if we do nothing that injures others.

Our first moral obligation is to ourselves – to seek all the things that are really good for us, the things all of us need, and only those apparent goods that are innocuous rather than noxious.

Above is an [edited] selection from Wikipedia -
** **

         What we need to do is whittle this down to Merlyn's way of thinking. He knows Aristotle and because he is conscious during the present he knows Mortimer J. Adler and Wikipedia. 
We need to simplify these six points first. - Amorella

         I am going to need some help on this, Amorella.

         I would imagine so, if I could. - Amorella

         1553 hours. Carol is at the end of a chapter, page 117 in Berry's book.

         Post, orndorff. - Amorella      


         2134 hours. I have reduced Adler's words to five paragraphs totaling 263 words as a part of the first draft of Dead 13. I am uneasy with the words because they were placed by my fingers not by my reason. I feel Aristotle and Adler would disapprove. Plus, I have a lot of bloody arrogance strewn between the lines and margins.

         I approve nevertheless orndorff. Deal with it. Drop in and post. All for tonight. - Amorella

***

The Dead 13, 1st drafting w/out intro

          We Dead have particular rules we attempt to follow for a general social order to occur. For instance if one is walking it is helpful to walk on a path that delivers you from point A to point B. We are more ridged than you the Living might think. We must conform to the way things are. First, we have to realize who we are, who we really are. These are self-evident truths the Living may deny for a lifetime. Like Alice, you have to pass through the Looking Glass to enter our domain.

          We Dead survive for what Ends? We like the Living do not know. We attempt to be social while we wait though we have choice. We have the right to mature while we wait.
We Dead have a set of ethics focusing basically on the four cardinal virtues: temperance, courage, justice and prudence. These four are woven within the circulation of heartansoulanmind as blood was circulated throughout the body in life. The more giving the spirit is in these four virtues the freer one is, that is, the more transparent the spirit is, the more the spirit is as the soul from which it came, unseen. but known and understood within one's humanity.

          We Dead, wait, enjoying the learning, enjoying the company of others who always remind us of who we are as we grow or do not grow. To live, as it were, trafficking The Golden Rule within our own stuffing.

         We Dead rose from clay. We are Dead and still Alive and our Judgments stay our own.  

263 words
***

No comments:

Post a Comment