Notes - exercises / geography / soul training? / in principle

         You did your exercises, thirty-five minutes worth today, then helped Carol with her exercises. Carol is icing her knee and has suggested Cracker Barrel for lunch. – Amorella

         1239 hours. She is doing better on her exercises every day – lots of progress over the last three weeks (three weeks on Tuesday). Routine is our framework, which I like, at least at present. I would like to know the shape of the mind. Surely it is not Big Bang like. Consciousness arrives and the mind expands – limited by our environment, that is, our body and brain being ‘attached’ to our worldly sensed environment. It would seem to me that the ‘textures’ of the mind would be different that the ‘textures’ of the heart and of the soul. Timelessness, for instance, would set differently in the heart and the soul than it would in the mind; or it seems to me that it would. The fabrics of each would also be different in construction. What color would best suit the mind? I cannot imagine that a ‘blue’ would be the choice of all three. Surely the heartansoulanmind are not aspects of the same thing. Our languages sort them separately perhaps intuitively. I piece them separately and together, puzzle-like fitting in two dimensions. How would one pull pieces from one dimension alone? Geography.

         Post. – Amorella

         You had take out from Potbelly’s for lunch and while Carol was reading a section of the Sunday paper and eating you were reading a couple of articles in the newest Harper’s which came a couple of days ago. This triggers the thought that if Goggle augmentation software programs were used to separate matters of the heart and soul and mind people might learn something from this. For instance, which matters of the heart influence the soul more? Are matters of the heart always a priority of the soul? What causes the soul to rise up against the mind and/or the heart? - Amorella

         It seems that if we knew these things we would be better able to understand individual human behavior. Look what Google and Facebook learn from the individual as well as collective humanity? If we could better train our hearts and minds and souls, would we not be better ourselves? Churchill once said, according to the Harper’s article – that we create our buildings and in turn our buildings (architecture) train us. This is first a priority of personal moral philosophy. I can vaguely imagine a non-fiction work with the title: Training Your Soul. We work on training our minds, but I don’t know about a book titled: Training Your Heart. We use hypnosis as well as meditation techniques in terms of processing one’s mind. (1525)

         2023 hours. Perhaps the marsupial humanoids have a system that will be uncovered by the humans. Behavioral psychology based on the three invisibles but hardly unknowns – heart and soul and mind.

         You hate to lose what you think is a good idea. – Amorella

         Maybe it isn’t a good idea, but it is something to consider as long as I keep it reasonable.

         It seems to me that part of this is nothing more than semantics. – Amorella

         2029 hours. I hadn’t addressed this but you bring up a good point. No matter what myth or science you follow the north wind is still the north wind.

         And, thus, G---D is still G---D. – Amorella

         2031 hours. With proof or without proof, yes, I agree in principle: G---D is G---D.

         Post. – Amorella

         2034 hours. It amazes me sometimes how the morning in the mind rolls around to the evening in the mind – groceries to G---D on this particular roundabout of a day.