Mid-morning.
The plumbers, John and Craig, are working and Jill is also here. Last night
before bed you were ruminating about a definition for thought and found this as
a part of Wikipedia’s introduction.
** **
Thought can refer to the ideas or arrangements of ideas that result
from thinking, the act of producing thoughts, or the process of producing
thoughts. Although thought is a fundamental human activity familiar to
everyone, there is no generally accepted agreement as to what thought is or how
it is created. Thoughts may or may not arise in the mind from the
product of subconscious brain processing.
Because
thought underlies many human actions and interactions, understanding its
physical and metaphysical origins, processes, and effects has been a
longstanding goal of many academic disciplines including psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, artificial
intelligence, biology, sociology and cognitive science.
Thinking allows humans to make sense of, interpret,
represent or model the world they experience, and to make predictions about
that world. It is therefore helpful to an organism with needs, objectives, and
desires as it makes plans or otherwise attempts to accomplish those goals.
Selected and edited from Wikipedia (my underlining)
** **
0937
hours. The underlining I added above says more than I remembered, “There is no
generally accepted agreement as to what thought is or how it is created.”
Reason is assumed to be a part of the definition. However, at least in terms of
a spiritual being [i.e. Amorella] reason may be an integral part what ‘she’ is.
Human thought begins and becomes a picture
or words or both (body language/sounds). Reason is the beginning of explanation
or definition. That’s how I, the Amorella, see it. Before thought becomes
humanized it is an understood understanding. This is how it is with you and me.
This is as a direct line from neuron to neuron without the physics –
heart-to-heart understood communication without language. There is no room for
misunderstanding. You held your father-in-law’s right hand as he died. This is
as close as you have come to my meaning and understanding is this communication
between us. – Amorella
1012
hours. This Granville S. Hammond reference was totally unexpected but it
certainly hits home – understanding and empathy in terms of mutual loss. This
then is as communication between Amorella and myself.
Here is an example. You used ‘spiritual
being’ for myself but feel it is unfair. You don’t mind being called human but
have empathy for the Amorella. So, you changed the wording for me, not for
yourself. Give yourself credit, boy. You do have understanding and empathy, and
you have it for the Dead too, that is the reason you write about them. –
Amorella
1108
hours. It’s all imagination, Amorella.
It makes no difference, my man. It makes no
difference. – Amorella
1110
hours. Oh, my. My heart feels as if imagination doesn’t really make a
difference in terms of better understanding how it is to be human. The heart
needs a bridge to science or the other way around.
Science builds bridges. However, science and
the heart both rely on the unconscious and conscious for observation. –
Amorella
1121
hours. Do you have an unconsciousness, Amorella?
No. – Amorella
1125
hours. In my stories the Dead don’t have an unconsciousness either.
That’s reasonable enough. - Amorella
1127
hours. It appears self-evident that you had to enter my soul to enter my heart.
Does the soul guard who enters?
The function of the soul is to protect the
heart. Though this is in your
stories part of the concepts and ideas are nuanced, as it were, from me to you.
– Amorella
1136
hours. Well, if I’m covered by ‘it’s all imagination’ it doesn’t make any
difference.
Mid-afternoon.
Jill left some time ago and the Davy tree trimmers are winding down. It appears
John and Craig are also. It has been a busy day for these people. – Amorella
1436
hours. I remember doing similar kinds of work in my youth, mostly with David in
Blendon Township and also in Westerville City with a variety of summer duties, some
six or seven summers worth. Even before college I painted the lumber holding
barns along the railroad track at Cellar’s Lumber. Today however, I did next to
nothing. I used to have a certain fondness for working outside – no more.
You have some more work to add today, if you
like. Carol called. They enjoyed their trip into the Hocking Hills and are now
home. Linda is spending another night tonight at Kim and Paul’s. You are
planning to drive up in the morning. - Amorella
You have spent some time reading “Metaphysics”
from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. What things, as it were, do not
change? What is substance? You wonder, does a spiritual being change? If so,
how? Why? Or, is the soul substance? Does a soul exist in its own right? Is the heart? Is the mind? Does a
spiritual being exist in its own right, and if it does is it thus substance?
What is the difference between ‘being’ and ‘existing’? What is the mode of ‘being’?
What are categories of being? Is a category of being non-existent or empty?
This is where you are presently. Do you disagree? – Amorella
1712
hours. I wonder about these things and what is appropriate here. Souls and spiritual
beings and hearts and minds have to be reasoned out. This is my thinking.
You had Chinese to go from The Great Wall
near Kroger’s on Tylersville. Far too much good food for one meal so it’s in
the food cooler until Friday or Saturday. You watched NBC and ABC News and took
a break for entertainment, episode three of “Sex in the City” first season on
Amazon. – Amorella
2036
hours. Fun entertainment. I don’t think I ever saw the first season – quite relaxing
with good humor and humanity. We have other shows but I don’t want to watch
them without Carol. What has been in the back of my mind is ‘function’. On 19
December I asked and you responded.
** **
2213
hours. In context, what is the spiritual difference between a soul and the
Amorella?
Function. – Amorella
From -- 19 September 2016 post
** **
2114
hours. A few years ago you, the Amorella, stated you were a Betweener. Is a
Betweener a function or a spiritual being or both?
A Betweener, which I am, is function. –
Amorella
2118
hours. Is a spiritual being also a function?
Yes. I am what my function is. – Amorella
2123
hours. Are you given orders, of a sort? Did another spiritual being tell you to
enter my soul before entering my heart?
This is unknown to me. Consider my entering
your soul before entering your heart as a reflex. - Amorella
2127
hours. The soul opened and you entered simultaneously.
Yes. That will do. – Amorella
2132
hours. Did you simultaneously move from my soul and enter my heart?
I do not move. I am Here and here. I am a
spiritual nature with function. – Amorella
2138
hours. I need to make this conversation reasonable.
This is your function. – Amorella
2140
hours. This reminds me of two people in the same place having entirely
different conversations, though at the same time partially understood
conversations, with each other. I see this imaginary conversation ending with,
Jack saying, “What are you talking about?” and Jill replying, “What are you
talking about?”
Post, orndorff, and good night. – Amorella
2151 hours. Observation: This is leaving me without time sequences in place, at least this is my feeling about the situation. Perhaps I am just tired and readying for bed in my head.
No comments:
Post a Comment