22 May 2017

Notes - fully delightful thoughts / concept framing



       Almost noon. This morning you dropped off the Avalon at Toyota and Enterprise gave you a 2016 silver Fiat 500X with a red and black interior with most safety bells and whistles and FM/XM radio and spiffy wheels to drive. You were pleasantly surprised. - Amorella

       1157 hours. I was surprised. The car is spunky and fun to drive. The electric has been off for about four hours while Duke Power was upgrading our street line connections at the boxes and is supposed to be turned back on momentarily. Electric is on (1205).

       Afternoon. You discovered an article on 'M-theory' knowing it had to do with 'string theory' through reading Quora. Your focus interest is on how many dimensions reality contains according to physics. You hope is that you can find something that will related to communication transfers between Ship and Onesixanzero. Here is the article.

** **

Introduction to M-theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In non-technical terms, M-theory presents an idea about the basic substance of the universe. So far no experimental evidence exists showing that M-theory is a description of the real world Interest in this theory is mainly driven by mathematical elegance.

Background

In the early years of the 20th century, the atom – long believed to be the smallest building-block of matter – was proven to consist of even smaller components called protons, neutrons and electrons, which are known as subatomic particles. Starting in the 1960s, other subatomic particles began being discovered. In the 1970s, it was discovered that protons and neutrons (and other hadrons) are themselves made up of smaller particles called quarks. The Standard Model is the set of rules that describes the interactions of these particles.
In the 1980s, a new mathematical model of theoretical physics, called string theory, emerged. It showed how all the particles and all of the forms of energy in the universe could be constructed by hypothetical one-dimensional "strings", infinitesimal building-blocks that have only the dimension of length, but not height or width.
However, to make string theory mathematically consistent, the universe the strings exist in must have ten dimensions. This contradicts the experience that our real universe has four dimensions: three space dimensions (height, width, and length) and one time dimension. To "save" their theory, string theorists therefore added the explanation that the additional six dimensions exist but cannot be detected directly; this was explained by sophisticated mathematical objects called Calabi-Yau manifolds. The number of dimensions was later increased to 11 based on various interpretations of the 10-dimensional theory that led to five partial theories, as described below. Supergravity theory also played a significant part in establishing the necessity of the 11th dimension.
These "strings" vibrate in multiple dimensions, and depending on how they vibrate, they might be seen in three-dimensional space as matter, light or gravity. It is the vibration of the string which determines whether it appears to be matter or energy, and every form of matter or energy is the result of the vibration of strings.
String theory, as mentioned above, ran into a problem: another version of the equations was discovered, then another, and then another. Eventually, five major string theories were developed. The main differences between the theories were principally the number of dimensions in which the strings developed, and their characteristics (some were open loops, some were closed loops, etc.). Furthermore, all these theories appeared to be workable. Scientists were not comfortable with five seemingly contradictory sets of equations to describe the same thing.
Speaking at the string theory conference at University of Southern California  in 1995, Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study suggested  that the five different versions of string theory might be describing the same thing seen from different perspectives. He proposed a unifying theory called "M-theory", in which the "M" is not specifically defined but is generally understood to stand for "membrane". The words "matrix", "master", "mother", "monster", "mystery" and "magic" have also been claimed. M-theory brought all of the string theories together. It did this by asserting that strings are really one-dimensional slices of a two-dimensional membrane vibrating in 11-dimensional spacetime.

Status

M-theory is not complete, but the underlying structure of the mathematics has been established and is in agreement with all the string theories. Furthermore, it has passed many tests of internal mathematical consistency.
However, so far no experimental support of the M-theory exists. Some physicists are skeptical that this approach will ever lead to a physical theory describing our real world due to fundamental issues.
Nevertheless, some cosmologists are drawn to M-theory because of its mathematical elegance and relative simplicity, triggering the hope that the simplicity is a reason why it may describe our world. Physicist and author Michio Kaku has remarked that M-theory may present us with a "Theory of Everything" which is so concise that its underlying formula would fit on a T-shirt. Stephen Hawking originally believed that M-theory may be the ultimate theory but later suggested that the search for understanding of mathematics and physics will never be complete. However, Hawking later changed his mind and stated, "M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the universe." Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, in the popular-science book, The Grand Design, take a philosophical position to support a view of the universe as a multiverse, and define it in the book as model-dependent realism which along with a sum-over-histories approach (see path integral formulation of quantum mechanics) to the universe as a whole, is used to claim that M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the universe, mainly due to lack of viable alternatives.

Selected and edited from Wikipedia - M-theory
** **
       Two key points in the above article: one, 'M-theory brought all of the string theories together. It did this by asserting that strings are really one-dimensional slices of a two-dimensional membrane vibrating in 11-dimensional spacetime'; and two, 'Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow's The Grand Design, takes a philosophical position to support a view of the universe as a multiverse, and define it in the book as model-dependent realism which along with a sum-over-histories approach (see path integral formulation of quantum mechanics) to the universe as a whole, is used to claim that M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the universe, mainly due to lack of viable alternatives.' The key words for Soki's Choice are " two dimensional membrane string vibrations in spacetime" and "a spacetime universe is really a multiverse”. - Amorella
       1427 hours. Why not include "one-dimensional slices of  two-dimensional spacetime"?
       Because, in here, boy, I, the Amorella, say Soki is a one-dimensional slice of consciousness.
       1429 hours. Whoa. I did not see that coming. At first I put down Amorella rather than Soki, but the story is not about Amorella.
       Our communication feed gets stuck at your end because I am as a "simple non-mathematical elegance" in this post's context. - Amorella
       1437 hours. I find these fully delightful thoughts Amorella, thank you.
       Post. - Amorella

       Later afternoon. You are at Kroger's on Mason-Montgomery Road after running errands and having  kids' cups treat at Graeter's. - Amorella
       1638 hours. I have never thought of consciousness in terms of physics membrane strings before.
       Let's go with vibrations rather than membrane though both are still reduced to physical attributes. - Amorella
       1642 hours. Even "strings are really one-dimensional slices of a two-dimensional membrane vibrating in 11-dimensional spacetime" is physics. How can we allude to it as metaphysics instead, i.e. 'metaphysical vibrations'?
       You are looking for a definition. Begin with the dictionary, boy, as you would any foreign language. - Amorella
       1646 hours. Good darkish humor . . . English as a foreign language.
       This is what you do as if you can't remember what words mean. - Amorella
       1648 hours. I forget nuances.
       ** **
metaphysical - adjective 1. based on abstract (typically, excessively abstract) reasoning: an empiricist rather than a metaphysical view of law. transcending physical matter or the laws of nature across space and time.

vibration - noun 1. an oscillation of the parts of a fluid or an elastic solid whose equilibrium has been disturbed, or of an electromagnetic wave. (vibrations informal) a person's emotional state, the atmosphere of a place, or the associations of an object, as communicated to and felt by others.

Selected and heavily edited from the Oxford/American mac software

** **
       You are home.
       1720 hours. On metaphysical I don't agree with the 'or' as "matter or the laws of nature. Metaphysics is a part of the laws of higher nature in any case, like if you, the Amorella, are one-dimensional and I am three/four dimensional we both presently share the same time and space but are also one dimensional with no need of a two-dimensional membrane vibrating in 11-dimensional spacetime. I'm just free framing a concept here. You are in my emotional and intellectual state of my consciousness. We communicate this through writing so that I and others can read the unconsciousness imbedded in my consciousness.  (1733)

       Take a break, my man. We'll run with this later tonight or tomorrow. - Post.

No comments:

Post a Comment