Early afternoon. You did your exercises. - Amorella
Moving on bedtime. You read
most of new Popular Science. - Amorella
2145 hours. It's feature is on "time and space" which is
always of special interest to me. I am reading the articles completely.
Personally, I think both distort the greater reality; I think we shall never
have a greater understanding of underlying Reality as long as we think in terms
of time and space. I see them as an illusion of sorts because we need both to
create and understand the process of human thought. Ironic to the point of
humor, thus I feel there is something to my conjecture. - rho
You don't know where that bit came from but
it wasn't there when you posted "I am reading the articles
completely". - Amorella
2153 hours. No, it wasn't. But I was not thinking of the material, the
physical world; I was thinking no further than the process of critical thinking. - rho
You appear to be making an inference of Reality
before the creation of the physical universes. - Amorella
2157
hours. Yes, because that base Reality existed before time and space. I don't
see it as a form of . . . I have lost my point . . . immortality because it was
not a concept. Whatever ran such an engine (such a setting as Before) allows consciousness to be the exhaust. Consciousness in a
singular form exists from before the original 'big bang' of the first of a
multitude of universes from human perspectives of consciousness. Original Consciousness
caused 'Being'. Being caused the original physics. Original physics caused the
perception of time and space. - rho
Do you believe this, boy? - Amorella
2208 hours. Belief came later when subjectivity and
objectivity moved apart. - rho
Do you concur that subjectivity
and objectivity are conditions that allow thought to occur? - Amorella
2213 hours. I have no idea. This is just stream of
consciousness in lettered forms.
Post. - Amorella
2214 hours. I might as well have been speaking in
tongues.
What an odd thing to say, boy. - Amorella
No comments:
Post a Comment