You had a busy morning getting all the leaves out and
covered with tarps for tomorrow's pick-up. The problem is the wind is supposed
to become worse this afternoon.
Who
would have thought that any storm coming into New Jersey would drive clouds and
wind back to Cincinnati. I listened to the New York boroughs fire departments
and emergency runs for a little while before bed and checked Tweeter but it was
most anticipation, some thinking the storm will be the worse thing ever and
other figuring it will not even come close to its great expectations.
Personally, it wouldn't surprise me if it suddenly turned right and out to sea.
And, if it stays on track that won't surprise me either.
You're not so easily surprised? - Amorella
I
knew this was coming. I could feel it rising from my right shoulder or
mid-spine, I don't know which. The closed event that I can relate this feeling
to is like when one of my arthritic joints tell me there is a weather change
coming. I suppose the latter has to do with air pressure, I don't know about
the former other than intuition rising or shifting somewhere in the upper right
of my back. Then again, back to imagination. This is a waste of words because
nothing is ever resolved. The point of contact was "You're". It was
easy to fill in the rest. Self-questioning is a habit of mine at least in my
head.
Which
comes first, the doubts or the self-questioning? - Amorella
I
have no idea.
The doubts come first, at least in your
case. Pure cause and effect.
In
the books is there always a "First Cause"?
No.
- Amorella
Now,
that is a surprise. By definition, if a book is written it has to have an
author.
You capitalized First Cause. - Amorella
Oh.
That is habit, that is its usual context. G---D or Something First.
Is
it not arrogant and self-serving to think all constructions have to follow
known human observed natural rules? By the same thinking, if there are rules
then who is the Ruler who made them up? - Amorella
I
see a problem in the construction and use of language when dealing with First
Cause. This is one of the reasons I put three dashes between G and D. Human
beings are missing letters thus we cannot translate, that's my way around this
circumstance.
In the first trilogy you remember that you
thought it would be cleverly funny to have the marsupial-humanoids feel the
speed of light (as a natural constant) as zero, that what they worked from. -
Amorella
True.
I wanted to stir things up a bit as they were alien mathematicians. Now I am
having Doug read these reconstructions and perhaps it is not so clever to
continue this line of 'alien reasoning'. Besides, after a few years I find this
rather embarrassing and not really so clever; though I still see the humor as
validation for once considering the speed of light to be zero.
I
just checked the three books I only found one reference to the 'speed of light'
and it is in The Brothers, book three. I am sure that I had mentioned this
someplace in book one. Obviously I am wrong which is just as well. . . . I
checked for "zero" also and could not find its use in context with
light speed.
What if I put the concept in Pouch-5? -
Amorella
Why,
Amorella. It is not a reasonable construction to use zero as the constant speed
of light.
As long as it is a theoretical constant what
makes the difference what the speed of light is? - Amorella
I
don't know, Amorella. This is beyond my thinking.
You thought it once. - Amorella
As
a joke, Amorella. I think lots of things; that doesn't mean much of anything.
People run stuff through their minds all the time. These are just thoughts,
constructions, Amorella. They are not real. My mind likes to 'play' with
constructions and make jokes out of them once in a while. It is just human silliness.
(1305)
Post. Amorella
1501 hours. We had
a late satisfying lunch at Chipotle/Panera; and now a stop at Kroger's for milk
and deli meats/cheese on Tylersville on the way home. It is quite windy, cold
and December crisp today.
I
sent Doug a note about the theoretical speed of light but I don't see what its
purpose would be in Pouch-5. I am glad you brought up about the 'bird remains'
as possible alien evidence no matter how well the plane is sterilized. And, it
is interesting to think on the possible reasons for Ship to allow the 'touch'
on the Cessna left wingtip. It is funny because it shows that even
sophisticated machinery from twenty thousand years beyond on time can still
present problems without having the usual Star Trek/Star Wars
type of mechanical or quantum physics complication. Ship's consciousness, if it
is similar to human consciousness, is easier for us readers to understand. I
assume the reasoning is legitimate, that is, this is not deus ex machina.
Your spelling is atrocious. - Amorella
Thank
goodness for the Word speller and online searches for a correct or better
spelling. I destroyed 'sterilized' and 'legitimate'. I might as well have been
a third or fourth grader.
Many of them could handle both words. -
Amorella
It
is so embarrassing and ironic that I am such a poor speller. All this love of
words and I can't put many of them together properly. I can usually see when
they are wrong (I don't need a red line placed under them), but . . . it goes
back to seventh or eighth grade and my spelling of 'frequent' on a spelling
test (freakwent). The teacher called my mother; I suppose thinking something
was wrong in my head. I think I spelled the two latest ones 'stearalized' and
'legitament'. When I do it is like a strong bolt of graveyard humor and humility
mixed together as I note the obvious error; and it is like 'what in the world am I doing trying to write
novels, let alone ones that mention the speed of light?' I am not well put
together (period). I love humor though so it all bodes me well. No complaints.
1559
hours. We are home and the groceries are put away. Doug sent a reply to the
speed of light at zero and it is not at all what I expected (I really didn't
have a clue as what to expect). Here it is:
** **
Dick, Very
interesting concept. Some things to consider if the speed of light were zero.
The entire universe would be black as light could not travel anywhere.
There would be no time dilation. Every mass would be infinite, which I think
would mean that mass does not exist. There would be no relationship between
energy and mass which means the sun would stop working. Gravity would also
probably disappear. Light always travels at the same speed no matter the
speed of the reference system. So zero speed means no light. Sounds indeed like
the land of the dead where there is no time. Maybe the land of dark matter.
Doug
** **
I particularly like the last three sentences
as seeds for construction. Thank you, Dr. Goss. Post. - Amorella
I thank you too, Doug. What a spark for imagination . . . the land of the dead and/or the land of dark matter. Talk about fun thinking.
Later,
dude, Post. - Amorella
I thank you too, Doug. What a spark for imagination . . . the land of the dead and/or the land of dark matter. Talk about fun thinking.
Much later in the evening. You are reading an
article on Dark Matter that you have read before. Copy the introductory
material and drop it in your notes here. - Amorella
**
**
Dark Energy, Dark Matter
In the early 1990's,
one thing was fairly certain about the expansion of the Universe. It might have
enough energy density to stop its expansion and recollapse, it might have so
little energy density that it would never stop expanding, but gravity was
certain to slow the expansion as time went on. Granted, the slowing had not
been observed, but, theoretically, the Universe had to slow. The Universe is
full of matter and the attractive force of gravity pulls all matter together.
Then came 1998 and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations of very
distant supernovae that showed that, a long time ago, the Universe was actually
expanding more slowly than it is today. So the expansion of the Universe has
not been slowing due to gravity, as everyone thought, it has been accelerating.
No one expected this, no one knew how to explain it. But something was causing
it.
Eventually
theorists came up with three sorts of explanations. Maybe it was a result of a
long-discarded version of Einstein's theory of gravity, one that contained what
was called a "cosmological constant." Maybe there was some strange
kind of energy-fluid that filled space. Maybe there is something wrong with
Einstein's theory of gravity and a new theory could include some kind of field
that creates this cosmic acceleration. Theorists still don't know what the
correct explanation is, but they have given the solution a name. It is called
dark energy.
What Is Dark
Energy?
More is unknown than is
known. We know how much dark energy there is because we know how it affects the
Universe's expansion. Other than that, it is a complete mystery. But it is an
important mystery. It turns out that
roughly 70% of the Universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 25%. The
rest - everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our
instruments, all normal matter - adds up to less than 5% of the Universe.
Come to think of it, maybe it shouldn't be called "normal" matter at
all, since it is such a small fraction of the Universe.
From:
http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy/
** **
What is important here are these sentences: "It
turns out that roughly 70% of the Universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 25%. The rest - everything on Earth,
everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter - adds
up to less than 5% of the Universe." It would make sense that with
a twenty thousand year head start the marsupial humanoids would attempt to
exploit this fact. - Amorella
But we don't know that it is indeed a fact. It may
appear to be one at present but the plausibility of Ship . . . wait, is the
"blackenot" that makes Ship appear invisible to the eye and earth instrumentation
a form of dark matter?
What is Ship were coated with a form of the
material, no light and no time except within the core where it would not
register to the passengers just as if the universe itself were within a black
hole. How would you know the difference? - Amorella
I don't know. I'll have to ask Doug if there could
be a plausibility of such a theoretical use for a quick explanation for
presentation within Pouch-5. (2051)
No comments:
Post a Comment