18 November 2014

Notes - organic molecules / messy / rabbit hole up humor /

         1239 hours. Some real science news today.

** **
BBC Science and Environment

18 November 2014 Last updated at 11:48 ET


Comet landing: Organic molecules detected by Philae

By Paul Rincon

Science editor, BBC News website
The Philae lander has detected organic molecules on the surface of its comet, scientists have confirmed.

Carbon-containing "organics" are the basis of life on Earth and may give clues to chemical ingredients delivered to our planet early in its history.

The compounds were picked up by a German-built instrument designed to "sniff" the comet's thin atmosphere.

Other analyses suggest the comet's surface is largely water-ice covered with a thin dust layer.

Philae touched down on the Comet 67P on 12 November after a 10-year journey.

Dr Fred Goessmann, principal investigator on the Cosac instrument, which made the organics detection, confirmed the find to BBC News. But he added that the team was still trying to interpret the results.
It has not been disclosed which molecules have been found, or how complex they are.

But the results are likely to provide insights into the possible role of comets in contributing some of the chemical building blocks to the primordial mix from which life evolved on the early Earth.

Preliminary results from the MUPUS instrument, which deployed a hammer to the comet after Philae's landing, suggest there is a layer of dust 10-20cm thick on the surface with water-ice underneath.

The ice would be frozen solid at temperatures encountered in the outer Solar System - MUPUS data suggest this layer has a tensile strength similar to sandstone.

Scientists had to race to perform as many key tests as they could before Philae's battery life ran out at the weekend.

A key objective was to drill a sample of "soil" and analyse it in COSAC's oven. But, disappointingly, the latest information suggest no soil was delivered to the instrument.

Selected and edited from BBC
** **

         1240 hours. This news,  to me, reinforces the theory of Panspermia.

** **

Panspermia is the hypothesis that life exists throughout the Universe. . . . Panspermia proposes that microscopic life forms that can survive the effects of space. . . . If met with ideal conditions on a new planet's surfaces, the organisms become active and the process of evolution begins. Panspermia is not meant to address how life began, just the method that may cause its distribution in the Universe.

Selected and edited from Wikipedia

** **


         You are excited by the prospects because it is a confirmation that life may more than likely exist elsewhere in the universe. – Amorella
        
         Carol has errands so you find yourself waiting at Kroger’s on Tylersville after stopping at Huntington Bank off Cox Road. Carol is making Alta’s southwestern turkey/veggie soup for supper. You are slowly returning to a routine that promotes writing time and while it is you wish to be further along it makes little difference from my perspective. – Amorella

         1327 hours. I can’t imagine it making any difference at all from your perspective Amorella. People have individual passions that well up in their lives. Personally, I find this science fact unveiled this morning as rather humbling, though I am satisfied so humbled. All the spouting and preaching and arrogance of our ‘fair’ species how is it then our earthly origin may have come from the potential seed carried in/on a dirty lumbering comet from long ago. The earth was seeded, evolves and flowers whether we are here or not. It is such a simple act of seeding the organics. I don’t know if there is a G---D behind this or not, but I surely see the humor. Life has messy beginnings and conclusions and we fail to see the messy chaos as an organization to get us into and out of this ‘place’ we find ourselves in life. I’ll stop now. No more rattling on.

         Sounds like you like to spout and preach too, boy, what do you think? – Amorella

         1408 hours. We are home. I am no doubt as guilty as the next fellow on the spouting and preaching. I made my living from it, ironically. Added humility and no words left pretty much says it all.
        
         Later, dude. Post. - Amorella


         You had an excellent supper. Carol made your favorite, Grandma Schick’s recipe meat loaf, a baked potato and mixed cooked veggies. You watched several programs and have turned off the television for the night. You spent last night reading the newest Consumer Reports from cover to cover. And, earlier today you had the added excitement about a small part of the comet’s composition. You also read and sent an added work from Scientific American sharable print, which you found quite interesting. Even Doug said he knew nothing about left and right hand models of life.

** **

What Philae Did During Its 60 Hours on a Comet

The simple reason why the lander was sent all the way to a comet was to do chemistry that can explain the origin of life

November 18, 2014 By Mark Lorch and The Conversation UK 

Editor's note: The following essay is reprinted with permission from The Conversation, an online publication covering the latest research.

The drama of Philae’s slow fallbounce and unfortunate slide into hibernation was one of the most thrilling science stories of a generation. But what in its short 60 hours of life on Comet 67P did it achieve?

The short answer is analytical chemistry.

Philae’s payload included three instruments that are quite common in chemistry labs, but when deployed on a comet could answer questions about the origins of the solar system and life itself.

Right- or left-handed life

Four billion years ago the solar system was an unsettled place. Earth was undergoing heavy bombardment by asteroids and comets. This continuous shower may have delivered a significant amount of water to our planet. But the comets weren’t just dirty snowballs. A third of their contents was probably complex organic (that is, carbon-based) molecules. These compounds may well have triggered the chemistry that led to life on our planet.

One of Philae’s goals is to provide evidence that the organic chemicals on a comet are sufficiently similar to the building blocks of life to support the comet impact theory for abiogenesis. A key factor is whether Comet 67P (and by extension other comets) contain predominantly right- or left-handed molecules.

Many molecules come in one of two forms, known as stereoisomers, which chemists designate as left- or right-handed. These two forms are identical apart from the fact that they are mirror images of each other.

Your hands are a perfect analogy. Structurally, they are the same except for the fact that you can’t superimpose one on the other. And so it is with stereoisomers.

Strangely, life on Earth is based entirely on left-handed molecules. It is perfectly possible to make the right-handed versions, but life just doesn’t. Where this preference for left-handedness comes from is a mystery. One theory is that the bias came from within the chemistry of comets. In the comets, right-handed molecules may have been preferentially destroyed by a combination of sunlight (to provide energy to trigger chemical reactions) and liquid water (with which the organic compounds could react).

Philae’s COSAC instrument is designed to sniff away at the comet’s organic contents and figure out whether they look like the building blocks of life and, importantly, whether the comet contains the same preference for lefty chemistry as Earth-bound life.

Homegrown detritus or alien debris

Most theories hold that comets were formed from the same nebula that gave birth to rest of the solar system. But this need not be the case. It could be that they are truly ancient bodies that entirely, or in part, pre-date the solar system, or perhaps they have congregated here much more recently? Philae’s Ptolemy instrument aims to answer this question by comparing the ratios of different isotopes within Comet 67P.

A given element is defined by the number of protons in its nucleus. For example carbon always has six protons. However the number of neutrons can vary giving rise to carbon-12 (six protons and six neutrons), carbon-13 (with seven neutrons) and carbon-14 (with eight neutrons). All these different variations are known as isotopes. The ratio of these isotopes in any given body will vary depending on its origins. And since the material in the solar system came from more or less the same place, the isotopic carbon ratios for the Sun, the Earth and asteroids are pretty much the same.

But comets might be different, in fact remote measurements of comet Hale-Boop suggest that it may be an extra-solar alien. The problem is there were large uncertainties in these readings, so we can’t be sure of their accuracy. By sending the Ptolemy instrument to the surface of a comet this should all be resolved, as its isotopic measurements are meant to be as accurate as those performed on Earth, and the solar or alien origins of Comet 67P can be confirmed.

The snowball factories

If comets came from the same stock as the rest of the solar system where and how were they produced? The Hubble telescope spotted comets in the Kuiper belt just beyond Neptune, meanwhile the Oort Cloud (another 10,000 times further away) is thought to contain icy bodies that may, paradoxically, have condensed nearer to Jupiter and Saturn.

Figuring out where 67P may have originated is the job of APXS, an instrument designed to determine the elemental composition of dusty parts of the comet. By comparing this to material on Earth, the origins of which we are more confident about, we should be able to figure out the birth place of 67P.

Mark Lorch does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

Selected and edited from - http://www.scientificamericanDOTcom/article/what-philae-did-during-its-60-hours-on-a-comet/

** **

         2055 hours. This is really interesting. This new information helps us better see who we are and how the environmental mix was to get us here. I like to think we Homo sapiens are an accident of nature with perhaps a purpose partially of our own making (part of which may also be accidental). What is really cool is that in this extension of imagination we are not even including the possibility of multitudes of universes in varieties of various dimensions. Where is the room for human ego and arrogance in such thinking? What is the real academics, philosophy and theology in such a grand sense of accident or scheme of all matter and beyond? This is a larger than life world a transcendental existentialist such as myself can love. What humor has such a seemingly limitless bounds? I know next to nothing and I can revel in the delight.
        
         You revel only your honest self here, boy. – Amorella
        
         2110 hours. These are my feelings of the moment. It seems odd to wish to revel in one’s humility, but within is such a sense of freedom to wonder on all the steps leading to a higher sense of consciousness and the free will and responsibility that comes with such thinking. Perhaps we, and similar like species, are observers, explorers and caretakers of our own gatherings of such species.

         You cannot afford to take this beyond alien species similar to your own. There are always degrees below and beyond, you can see it in your own individual diversities without the tint of cultures within civilizations. I once mentioned an analogy with the worth of gemstones.

** **
From Notes: 11 February 2013

           On your questions concerning metaphysics in the Merlyn books: Consciousness works its way 'up' (if you will) in whatever environment self-awareness finds itself in. This is similar in the books' physics and metaphysics. An analogy relating to an aptitude for self-awareness can be found in geology, mineralogy, and eventually gemology. The 'rungs' on such a ladder in reference to a Deliverer, Rejoinder and Betweener would be as the differences in a consciousness of self-awareness found in this list from listverse.com of the top ten rarest gems for the sake of the analogy. The gem list is based on the cost per carat. Let's exchange dollar value for passion value to gain some semblance of what I am talking about. – Amorella

** ** **

1.         Jadeite                             USD $3,000,000/Carat
2.         Red Diamond                 USD $2.300,000/Carat
3.         Serendibite                     USD $1.900,000/Carat
4.         Blue Garnet                    USD $1,500,000/Carat    
     
5.         Painite                             USD $55,000/Carat         Deliverer
6.         Grandidierite                   USD $50,000/Carat         Rejoinder
7.         Musgravite                      USD $35,000/Carat         Betweener

8.         Red Beryl Emerald         USD $10,000/Carat
9.         Black Opal                       USD $2355/Carat
10.       Jeremejevite                    USD $2000/Carat

From: list verse.com

**
         Notice, the value is in carat only. We are talking about no other natural 'gem' characteristics that would add to the value of the gems above. The environment that induced the 'gems' be produced is also an unknown here. – Amorella

From – Notes -  “a gem analogy” – 11 February 2013 - Encounters in MInd

** ** **
        
         You see, wherever you go with this Alice’s Rabbit Hole is in looking up not down. This is the humor you refer to. It is your own humor boy. Post. – Amorella

         2126 hours. I can afford to live with it. 

No comments:

Post a Comment