Mid-afternoon. You are sitting in the black
bedroom lounger with the foot-stand up. Jadah is sitting on the end of the bed
by Carol’s covered with a blanket feet and she is sleeping. Earlier she spent
time working up some of Alta’s Arizona turkey soup for supper. Earlier, you had
your doctor’s appointment and all is well. Dr. Merling is pleased your A1c is
lower than it has been. You had a good chat with some laughs along the way. Dr.
Jeff and you get along quite well; you usually do with the medical doctors in
your life. So, what’s your question? – Amorella
1441
hours. Yesterday, in my imagination on the posting I had the angelic figure
asking me questions because it didn’t and doesn’t seem proper to ask an
imaginary angel (or any angel) my questions.
What possible questions could you have for
an angel, theoretical or otherwise? – Amorella
1445
hours. I don’t have any questions.
Don’t you think this is strange? – Amorella
1446
hours. Somewhat. I haven’t really thought about it. I figure (culturally) that
Angels do the asking to help the Dead live better in peace, that is, an Angel’s
job (from a human standpoint) is to comfort and help people better see
themselves from the inside out so that they may better adjust to their
circumstance in being dead as opposed to living.
Then why would a theoretical angel approach
the Living at all? – Amorella
1451
hours. Culturally (social/religious) an Angel approaches the Living to give a
message. I think of the Angel directing Adam and Eve from the Garden in Paradise
Lost. In real life why would an Angel give a message to the people when
people already have the gift of Free Will? It doesn’t make sense to intervene
with an angelic question or statement or directive either. “Go forth, out of
Eden,” would be understood by Adam and Eve, for instance, intuitively. The
stories of Angels don’t make proper sense. Besides that, any Angel worth his
salt, so to speak, would know there would be a very good chance the earthling
spoken to would misinterpret the message. Even in science fiction the dialogue
between earthling and alien would always be open to misinterpretation. . . .
Besides, it all comes down to knowing nothing or next to it. That’s the
earthlings’ bottom line (at least in terms of the metaphysical).
This post and the previous are themed with
elements of “Theoretical
Metaphysics”. How is that? - Amorella
1525
hours. That’s funny. I should change the Merlyn books to Theoretical
Metaphysics rather than Literary Fiction or just plain Fiction. Who would have
thought “theoretical metaphysics”? It actually sounds like a fun class. I’d
take it if it were offered. – In real life theologians might not take to the
word ‘theoretical’ and ‘creative’ might be used in its place. Theologians might
not like that either, actually, creative metaphysics might even be more
offensive. It was a fun idea anyway.
A darker thought suddenly appeared and you
are trying to suppress it. – Amorella
1537
hours. I don’t know why it popped up. I’m not quite sure how to express the
concept.
Theoretical
and Creative Metaphysics is a human conduit in which the world’s theological
philosophies might show off their works. – The awkwardness of this first
draft concept shows it is entirely my own.
Your
focus, Boy, should be on the spiritual not the worldly, don’t you think? –
Amorella
1556
hours. I think by trying to suppress the thought it is one I am not
comfortable venturing into. I don’t think of it as either spiritual or worldly.
The concept, as I view it, is much smaller than that – I would rather the
spiritual be separate from the theoretical and creative process though I don’t
have a clue as to how such would be accomplished.
1753
hours. I don’t know how else to begin but by definition.
** **
spiritual - adjective
1 your spiritual self:
nonmaterial, incorporeal,
intangible; inner, mental, psychological; transcendent, ethereal, otherworldly,
mystic, mystical, metaphysical; (rare) extramundane.
religious – adjective
2 religious beliefs: theological,
scriptural, doctrinal, ecclesiastical, church, faith-based, churchly, holy,
divine, sacred.
Selected and edited
from Oxford/American software
** **
I, the Amorella, suggest you delete ‘spiritual’
from religious in this contextual use.
1802
hours. I was debating on what to do here but you simplified it very quickly. Thank
you. However, holy, divine and sacred stay?
Religions can be holy, divine and sacred.
The point here is focusing on defining spiritual as separate from religious, is
it not? – Amorella
1806
hours. Yes.
You do not need Wikipedia on this; the fewer
words the better. – Amorella
1810
hours. Spiritual suggests an individual approach while religious suggests
individual and communial approach.
1822
hours. Does this mean that if two or more people gather together in a spiritual
like gathering that they are religious and not spiritual?
If the gathering is for silent prayer and/or
meditation only it is spiritual. No theology, no scripture, no doctrine is
spoken or alluded to in a spiritual gathering. A spiritual gathering is one of tone
– showing a public friendly spirit towards self and others. – Amorella
1833
hours. Enough for now. I have to let this sink in.
Post. – Amorella
1834
hours. I might have more questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment